Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Z
ZODB
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
ZODB
Commits
6a02109b
Commit
6a02109b
authored
Apr 16, 2004
by
Jeremy Hylton
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
The transaction tests belong here rather than in ZODB.
parent
c4aa0e87
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
647 additions
and
0 deletions
+647
-0
src/transaction/tests/test_transaction.py
src/transaction/tests/test_transaction.py
+647
-0
No files found.
src/transaction/tests/test_transaction.py
0 → 100644
View file @
6a02109b
##############################################################################
#
# Copyright (c) 2001, 2002 Zope Corporation and Contributors.
# All Rights Reserved.
#
# This software is subject to the provisions of the Zope Public License,
# Version 2.0 (ZPL). A copy of the ZPL should accompany this distribution.
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES ARE DISCLAIMED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, AGAINST INFRINGEMENT, AND FITNESS
# FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
#
##############################################################################
"""Test tranasction behavior for variety of cases.
I wrote these unittests to investigate some odd transaction
behavior when doing unittests of integrating non sub transaction
aware objects, and to insure proper txn behavior. these
tests test the transaction system independent of the rest of the
zodb.
you can see the method calls to a jar by passing the
keyword arg tracing to the modify method of a dataobject.
the value of the arg is a prefix used for tracing print calls
to that objects jar.
the number of times a jar method was called can be inspected
by looking at an attribute of the jar that is the method
name prefixed with a c (count/check).
i've included some tracing examples for tests that i thought
were illuminating as doc strings below.
TODO
add in tests for objects which are modified multiple times,
for example an object that gets modified in multiple sub txns.
$Id: test_transaction.py,v 1.1 2004/04/16 00:19:38 jeremy Exp $
"""
import
unittest
import
transaction
from
ZODB.utils
import
positive_id
class
TransactionTests
(
unittest
.
TestCase
):
def
setUp
(
self
):
self
.
orig_tm
=
transaction
.
manager
transaction
.
manager
=
transaction
.
TransactionManager
()
self
.
sub1
=
DataObject
()
self
.
sub2
=
DataObject
()
self
.
sub3
=
DataObject
()
self
.
nosub1
=
DataObject
(
nost
=
1
)
def
tearDown
(
self
):
transaction
.
manager
=
self
.
orig_tm
# basic tests with two sub trans jars
# really we only need one, so tests for
# sub1 should identical to tests for sub2
def
testTransactionCommit
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
()
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
==
0
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
1
def
testTransactionAbort
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
abort
()
assert
self
.
sub2
.
_p_jar
.
cabort
==
1
def
testTransactionNote
(
self
):
t
=
get_transaction
()
t
.
note
(
'This is a note.'
)
self
.
assertEqual
(
t
.
description
,
'This is a note.'
)
t
.
note
(
'Another.'
)
self
.
assertEqual
(
t
.
description
,
'This is a note.
\
n
\
n
Another.'
)
t
.
abort
()
def
testSubTransactionCommitCommit
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
0
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
1
get_transaction
().
commit
()
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
1
def
testSubTransactionCommitAbort
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
get_transaction
().
abort
()
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
0
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
cabort
==
0
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
cabort_sub
==
1
def
testMultipleSubTransactionCommitCommit
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
# reset a flag on the original to test it again
self
.
sub1
.
ctpc_finish
=
0
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
# this is interesting.. we go through
# every subtrans commit with all subtrans capable
# objects... i don't like this but its an impl artifact
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
0
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
>
0
# add another before we do the entire txn commit
self
.
sub3
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
()
# we did an implicit sub commit, is this impl artifact?
assert
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
>
1
def
testMultipleSubTransactionCommitAbortSub
(
self
):
"""
sub1 calling method commit
sub1 calling method tpc_finish
sub2 calling method tpc_begin
sub2 calling method commit
sub2 calling method tpc_finish
sub3 calling method abort
sub1 calling method commit_sub
sub2 calling method commit_sub
sub2 calling method tpc_vote
sub1 calling method tpc_vote
sub1 calling method tpc_finish
sub2 calling method tpc_finish
"""
# add it
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
# add another
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
0
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
>
0
# add another before we do the entire txn commit
self
.
sub3
.
modify
()
# abort the sub transaction
get_transaction
().
abort
(
1
)
# commit the container transaction
get_transaction
().
commit
()
assert
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
cabort
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
>
1
# repeat adding in a nonsub trans jars
def
testNSJTransactionCommit
(
self
):
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
()
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
1
def
testNSJTransactionAbort
(
self
):
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
abort
()
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
0
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
cabort
==
1
# XXX
def
BUGtestNSJSubTransactionCommitAbort
(
self
):
"""
this reveals a bug in transaction.py
the nosub jar should not have tpc_finish
called on it till the containing txn
ends.
sub calling method commit
nosub calling method tpc_begin
sub calling method tpc_finish
nosub calling method tpc_finish
nosub calling method abort
sub calling method abort_sub
"""
self
.
sub1
.
modify
(
tracing
=
'sub'
)
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
(
tracing
=
'nosub'
)
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
1
# bug, non sub trans jars are getting finished
# in a subtrans
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
0
get_transaction
().
abort
()
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
cabort
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
cabort_sub
==
1
def
testNSJSubTransactionCommitCommit
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
0
get_transaction
().
commit
()
#assert self.nosub1._p_jar.ccommit_sub == 0
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
1
def
testNSJMultipleSubTransactionCommitCommit
(
self
):
"""
sub1 calling method tpc_begin
sub1 calling method commit
sub1 calling method tpc_finish
nosub calling method tpc_begin
nosub calling method tpc_finish
sub2 calling method tpc_begin
sub2 calling method commit
sub2 calling method tpc_finish
nosub calling method tpc_begin
nosub calling method commit
sub1 calling method commit_sub
sub2 calling method commit_sub
sub1 calling method tpc_vote
nosub calling method tpc_vote
sub2 calling method tpc_vote
sub2 calling method tpc_finish
nosub calling method tpc_finish
sub1 calling method tpc_finish
"""
# add it
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
# add another
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
0
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_vote
==
0
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
>
0
# add another before we do the entire txn commit
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
# commit the container transaction
get_transaction
().
commit
()
# we did an implicit sub commit
assert
self
.
sub2
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
>
1
### Failure Mode Tests
#
# ok now we do some more interesting
# tests that check the implementations
# error handling by throwing errors from
# various jar methods
###
# first the recoverable errors
def
testExceptionInAbort
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
'abort'
)
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub1
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
self
.
sub2
.
modify
()
try
:
get_transaction
().
abort
()
except
TestTxnException
:
pass
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
cabort
==
1
assert
self
.
sub2
.
_p_jar
.
cabort
==
1
def
testExceptionInCommit
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
'commit'
)
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub1
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
try
:
get_transaction
().
commit
()
except
TestTxnException
:
pass
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
0
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit
==
1
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
==
1
def
testExceptionInTpcVote
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
'tpc_vote'
)
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub1
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
try
:
get_transaction
().
commit
()
except
TestTxnException
:
pass
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_finish
==
0
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit
==
1
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
==
1
def
testExceptionInTpcBegin
(
self
):
"""
ok this test reveals a bug in the TM.py
as the nosub tpc_abort there is ignored.
nosub calling method tpc_begin
nosub calling method commit
sub calling method tpc_begin
sub calling method abort
sub calling method tpc_abort
nosub calling method tpc_abort
"""
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
'tpc_begin'
)
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub1
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
try
:
get_transaction
().
commit
()
except
TestTxnException
:
pass
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
==
1
assert
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
==
1
def
testExceptionInTpcAbort
(
self
):
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
(
'tpc_abort'
,
'tpc_vote'
))
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub1
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
try
:
get_transaction
().
commit
()
except
TestTxnException
:
pass
assert
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
==
1
### More Failure modes...
# now we mix in some sub transactions
###
def
testExceptionInSubCommitSub
(
self
):
# It's harder than normal to verify test results, because
# the subtransaction jars are stored in a dictionary. The
# order in which jars are processed depends on the order
# they come out of the dictionary.
self
.
sub1
.
modify
()
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub2
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
'commit_sub'
)
self
.
sub2
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
self
.
sub3
.
modify
()
try
:
get_transaction
().
commit
()
except
TestTxnException
:
pass
if
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
:
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
,
1
)
else
:
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
.
cabort_sub
,
1
)
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
sub2
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
,
1
)
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
nosub1
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
,
1
)
if
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
:
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
,
1
)
else
:
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
cabort_sub
,
1
)
def
testExceptionInSubAbortSub
(
self
):
# This test has two errors. When commit_sub() is called on
# sub1, it will fail. If sub1 is handled first, it will raise
# an except and abort_sub() will be called on sub2. If sub2
# is handled first, then commit_sub() will fail after sub2 has
# already begun its top-level transaction and tpc_abort() will
# be called.
self
.
sub1
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
'commit_sub'
)
self
.
sub1
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
self
.
nosub1
.
modify
()
self
.
sub2
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
errors
=
'abort_sub'
)
self
.
sub2
.
modify
(
nojar
=
1
)
get_transaction
().
commit
(
1
)
self
.
sub3
.
modify
()
try
:
get_transaction
().
commit
()
except
TestTxnException
,
err
:
pass
else
:
self
.
fail
(
"expected transaction to fail"
)
# The last commit failed. If the commit_sub() method was
# called, then tpc_abort() should be called to abort the
# actual transaction. If not, then calling abort_sub() is
# sufficient.
if
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
ccommit_sub
:
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
ctpc_abort
,
1
)
else
:
self
.
assertEqual
(
self
.
sub3
.
_p_jar
.
cabort_sub
,
1
)
# last test, check the hosing mechanism
## def testHoserStoppage(self):
## # It's hard to test the "hosed" state of the database, where
## # hosed means that a failure occurred in the second phase of
## # the two phase commit. It's hard because the database can
## # recover from such an error if it occurs during the very first
## # tpc_finish() call of the second phase.
## for obj in self.sub1, self.sub2:
## j = HoserJar(errors='tpc_finish')
## j.reset()
## obj._p_jar = j
## obj.modify(nojar=1)
## try:
## get_transaction().commit()
## except TestTxnException:
## pass
## self.assert_(Transaction.hosed)
## self.sub2.modify()
## try:
## get_transaction().commit()
## except Transaction.POSException.TransactionError:
## pass
## else:
## self.fail("Hosed Application didn't stop commits")
class
DataObject
:
def
__init__
(
self
,
nost
=
0
):
self
.
nost
=
nost
self
.
_p_jar
=
None
def
modify
(
self
,
nojar
=
0
,
tracing
=
0
):
if
not
nojar
:
if
self
.
nost
:
self
.
_p_jar
=
NoSubTransactionJar
(
tracing
=
tracing
)
else
:
self
.
_p_jar
=
SubTransactionJar
(
tracing
=
tracing
)
get_transaction
().
register
(
self
)
class
TestTxnException
(
Exception
):
pass
class
BasicJar
:
def
__init__
(
self
,
errors
=
(),
tracing
=
0
):
if
not
isinstance
(
errors
,
tuple
):
errors
=
errors
,
self
.
errors
=
errors
self
.
tracing
=
tracing
self
.
cabort
=
0
self
.
ccommit
=
0
self
.
ctpc_begin
=
0
self
.
ctpc_abort
=
0
self
.
ctpc_vote
=
0
self
.
ctpc_finish
=
0
self
.
cabort_sub
=
0
self
.
ccommit_sub
=
0
def
__repr__
(
self
):
return
"<%s %X %s>"
%
(
self
.
__class__
.
__name__
,
positive_id
(
self
),
self
.
errors
)
def
sortKey
(
self
):
# All these jars use the same sort key, and Python's list.sort()
# is stable. These two
return
self
.
__class__
.
__name__
def
check
(
self
,
method
):
if
self
.
tracing
:
print
'%s calling method %s'
%
(
str
(
self
.
tracing
),
method
)
if
method
in
self
.
errors
:
raise
TestTxnException
(
"error %s"
%
method
)
## basic jar txn interface
def
abort
(
self
,
*
args
):
self
.
check
(
'abort'
)
self
.
cabort
+=
1
def
commit
(
self
,
*
args
):
self
.
check
(
'commit'
)
self
.
ccommit
+=
1
def
tpc_begin
(
self
,
txn
,
sub
=
0
):
self
.
check
(
'tpc_begin'
)
self
.
ctpc_begin
+=
1
def
tpc_vote
(
self
,
*
args
):
self
.
check
(
'tpc_vote'
)
self
.
ctpc_vote
+=
1
def
tpc_abort
(
self
,
*
args
):
self
.
check
(
'tpc_abort'
)
self
.
ctpc_abort
+=
1
def
tpc_finish
(
self
,
*
args
):
self
.
check
(
'tpc_finish'
)
self
.
ctpc_finish
+=
1
class
SubTransactionJar
(
BasicJar
):
def
abort_sub
(
self
,
txn
):
self
.
check
(
'abort_sub'
)
self
.
cabort_sub
=
1
def
commit_sub
(
self
,
txn
):
self
.
check
(
'commit_sub'
)
self
.
ccommit_sub
=
1
class
NoSubTransactionJar
(
BasicJar
):
pass
class
HoserJar
(
BasicJar
):
# The HoserJars coordinate their actions via the class variable
# committed. The check() method will only raise its exception
# if committed > 0.
committed
=
0
def
reset
(
self
):
# Calling reset() on any instance will reset the class variable.
HoserJar
.
committed
=
0
def
check
(
self
,
method
):
if
HoserJar
.
committed
>
0
:
BasicJar
.
check
(
self
,
method
)
def
tpc_finish
(
self
,
*
args
):
self
.
check
(
'tpc_finish'
)
self
.
ctpc_finish
+=
1
HoserJar
.
committed
+=
1
def
test_join
():
"""White-box test of the join method
The join method is provided for "backward-compatability" with ZODB 4
data managers.
The argument to join must be a zodb4 data manager,
transaction.interfaces.IDataManager.
>>> from ZODB.tests.sampledm import DataManager
>>> from transaction._transaction import DataManagerAdapter
>>> t = transaction.Transaction()
>>> dm = DataManager()
>>> t.join(dm)
The end result is that a data manager adapter is one of the
transaction's objects:
>>> isinstance(t._resources[0], DataManagerAdapter)
True
>>> t._resources[0]._datamanager is dm
True
"""
def
test_suite
():
from
doctest
import
DocTestSuite
return
unittest
.
TestSuite
((
DocTestSuite
(),
unittest
.
makeSuite
(
TransactionTests
),
))
if
__name__
==
'__main__'
:
unittest
.
TextTestRunner
().
run
(
test_suite
())
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment