Act as if a 3.3c1 release were being made. Maybe it will

be.  Besides "the usual" release fiddling, repaired many
out-of-date pieces of the ZODB programming guide; I'm sure
many remain, though.

NEWS.txt

-What's new in ZODB3 3.3 ?
-=========================
-Release date: DD-MMM-YYYY
+What's new in ZODB3 3.3 release candidate 1?
+============================================
+Release date: 14-Sep-2004
 
 Connection
 ----------
 
-ZODB intends to raise ConnnectionStateError if an attempt is made to close
-a connection while modifications are pending (the connection is involved in
-a transaction that hasn't been ``abort()``'ed or ``commit()``'ed).  It was
-missing the case where the only pending modifications were made in
-subtransactions.  This has been fixed.  If an attempt to close a connection
-with pending subtransactions is made now::
+ZODB intends to raise ``ConnnectionStateError`` if an attempt is made to
+close a connection while modifications are pending (the connection is
+involved in a transaction that hasn't been ``abort()``'ed or
+``commit()``'ed).  It was missing the case where the only pending
+modifications were made in subtransactions.  This has been fixed.  If an
+attempt to close a connection with pending subtransactions is made now::
 
     ConnnectionStateError: Cannot close a connection with a pending subtransaction
 
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ transaction
       >>> ...
       >>> txn.commit()
 
-  can't work as intended ib 3.3, because ``txn`` is no longer the current
+  can't work as intended in 3.3, because ``txn`` is no longer the current
   ``Transaction`` object the instant ``txn.begin()`` returns.
 
 BTrees
@@ -110,12 +110,12 @@ Collector #1488 (TemporaryStorage -- going backward in time).  This
 confusion was really due to that the detail on a ConflictError exception
 didn't make sense.  It called the current revision "was", and the old
 revision "now".  The detail is much more informative now.  For example,
-if the exception said:
+if the exception said::
 
     ConflictError: database conflict error (oid 0xcb22,
     serial was 0x03441422948b4399, now 0x034414228c3728d5)
 
-before, it now says:
+before, it now says::
 
     ConflictError: database conflict error (oid 0xcb22,
     serial this txn started with 0x034414228c3728d5 2002-04-14 20:50:32.863000,
@@ -131,20 +131,20 @@ the old serial).
 Tools
 -----
 
-FileStorage.FileIterator was confused about how to read a transaction's
+``FileStorage.FileIterator`` was confused about how to read a transaction's
 user and description fields, which caused several tools to display
 binary gibberish for these values.
 
-ZODB.utils.oid_repr() changed to add a leading "0x", and to strip leading
-zeroes.  This is used, e.g., in the detail of a POSKeyError exception, to
-identify the missing oid.  Before, the output was ambiguous.  For example,
-oid 17 was displayed as 0000000000000011.  As a Python integer, that's
-octal 9.  Or was it meant to be decimal 11?  Or was it meant to be hex?
-Now it displays as 0x11.
+``ZODB.utils.oid_repr()`` changed to add a leading "0x", and to strip
+leading zeroes.  This is used, e.g., in the detail of a ``POSKeyError``
+exception, to identify the missing oid.  Before, the output was ambiguous.
+For example, oid 17 was displayed as 0000000000000011.  As a Python
+integer, that's octal 9.  Or was it meant to be decimal 11?  Or was it
+meant to be hex? Now it displays as 0x11.
 
 fsrefs.py:
 
-    When run with -v, produced tracebacks for objects whose creation was
+    When run with ``-v``, produced tracebacks for objects whose creation was
     merely undone.  This was confusing.  Tracebacks are now produced only
     if there's "a real" problem loading an oid.
 
@@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ fsrefs.py:
     Now makes two passes, so that an accurate report can be given of all
     invalid references.
 
-analyze.py produced spurious "len of unsized object" messages when
+``analyze.py`` produced spurious "len of unsized object" messages when
 finding a data record for an object uncreation or version abort.  These
 no longer appear.
 
-fsdump.py's get_pickle_metadata() function (which is used by several
+``fsdump.py``'s ``get_pickle_metadata()`` function (which is used by several
 tools) was confused about what to do when the ZODB pickle started with
-a pickle GLOBAL opcode.  It actually loaded the class then, which it
+a pickle ``GLOBAL`` opcode.  It actually loaded the class then, which it
 intends never to do, leading to stray messages on stdout when the class
 wasn't available, and leading to a strange return value even when it was
 available (the repr of the type object was returned as "the module name",

README.txt

-ZODB3 3.3 beta 2
-================
+ZODB3 3.3 release candidate 1
+=============================
 
 Introduction
 ------------

doc/guide/prog-zodb.tex

@@ -239,15 +239,25 @@ transaction.commit()
 \end{verbatim}
 
 The \module{transaction} module defines a few top-level functions for
-working with transactions.  \method{commit()} writes any modified
-objects to disk, making the changes permanent.  \method{abort()} rolls
+working with transactions.  \function{commit()} writes any modified
+objects to disk, making the changes permanent.  \function{abort()} rolls
 back any changes that have been made, restoring the original state of
 the objects.  If you're familiar with database transactional
-semantics, this is all what you'd expect.  \method{get()} returns a
+semantics, this is all what you'd expect.  \function{get()} returns a
 \class{Transaction} object that has additional methods like
-\method{status()}, to check the current state of the transaction, and
 \method{note()}, to add a note to the transaction metadata.
 
+More precisely, the \module{transaction} module exposes an instance of
+the \class{ThreadTransactionManager} transaction manager class as
+\code{transaction.manager}, and the \module{transaction} functions
+\function{get()} and \function{begin()} redirect to the same-named
+methods of \code{transaction.manager}.  The \function{commit()} and
+\function{abort()} functions apply the methods of the same names to
+the \class{Transaction} object returned by \code{transaction.manager.get()}.
+This is for convenience.  It's also possible to create your own transaction
+manager instances, and to tell \code{DB.open()} to use your transaction
+manager instead.
+
 Because the integration with Python is so complete, it's a lot like
 having transactional semantics for your program's variables, and you
 can experiment with transactions at the Python interpreter's prompt:

doc/guide/transactions.tex

@@ -8,8 +8,32 @@
 
 \section{Transactions and Versioning}
 
-%\subsection{Committing and Aborting}
-% XXX There seems very little to say about commit/abort...
+\subsection{Committing and Aborting}
+
+Changes made during a transaction don't appear in the database until
+the transaction commits.  This is done by calling the \method{commit()}
+method of the current \class{Transaction} object, where the latter is
+obtained from the \method{get()} method of the current transaction
+manager.  If the default thread transaction manager is being used, then
+\code{transaction.commit()} suffices.
+
+Similarly, a transaction can be explicitly aborted (all changes within
+the transaction thrown away) by invoking the \method{abort()} method
+of the current \class{Transaction} object, or simply
+\code{transaction.abort()} if using the default thread transaction manager.
+
+Prior to ZODB 3.3, if a commit failed (meaning the \code{commit()} call
+raised an exception), the transaction was implicitly aborted and a new
+transaction was implicitly started.  This could be very surprising if the
+exception was suppressed, and especially if the failing commit was one
+in a sequence of subtransaction commits.
+
+So, starting with ZODB 3.3, if a commit fails, all further attempts to
+commit, join, or register with the transaction raise
+\exception{ZODB.POSException.TransactionFailedError}.  You must explicitly
+start a new transaction then, either by calling the \method{abort()} method
+of the current transaction, or by calling the \method{begin()} method of the
+current transaction's transaction manager.
 
 \subsection{Subtransactions}
 
@@ -35,14 +59,14 @@ or \method{abort()} method of the \class{Transaction} object.
 
 \begin{verbatim}
 # Commit a subtransaction
-get_transaction().commit(1)     
+transaction.commit(True)
 
 # Abort a subtransaction
-get_transaction().abort(1)   
+transaction.abort(True)
 \end{verbatim}
 
-A new subtransaction is automatically started on committing or
-aborting the previous subtransaction.
+A new subtransaction is automatically started upon successful committing
+or aborting the previous subtransaction.
 
 
 \subsection{Undoing Changes}
@@ -91,8 +115,8 @@ log several different changes made in the course of a single
 transaction.
 
 \begin{verbatim}
-get_transaction().setUser('amk')
-get_transaction().note('Change ownership')
+transaction.get().setUser('amk')
+transaction.get().note('Change ownership')
 \end{verbatim}
 
 To undo a transaction, call the \method{DB.undo(\var{id})} method,
@@ -115,6 +139,11 @@ that calls undo may not see the changes to the object until it calls
 
 \subsection{Versions}
 
+\begin{notice}[warning]
+  Versions should be avoided.  They're going to be deprecated,
+  replaced by better approaches to long-running transactions.
+\end{notice}
+
 While many subtransactions can be contained within a single regular
 transaction, it's also possible to contain many regular transactions
 within a long-running transaction, called a version in ZODB
@@ -155,7 +184,7 @@ different version or from an unversioned connection will cause a
 from ZODB.POSException import VersionLockError
 
 try:
-    get_transaction().commit()
+    transaction.commit()
 except VersionLockError, (obj_id, version):
     print ('Cannot commit; object %s '
            'locked by version %s' % (obj_id, version))

doc/guide/zeo.tex

@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ transaction:
 \begin{verbatim}
 from ZEO import ClientStorage
 from ZODB import DB
+import transaction
 
 # Change next line to connect to your ZEO server
 addr = 'kronos.example.com', 1975
@@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ root['list'] = ['a', 'b', 1.0, 3]
 root['dict'] = {'a':1, 'b':4}
 
 # Commit the transaction
-get_transaction().commit()
+transaction.commit()
 \end{verbatim}
 
 If this code runs properly, then your ZEO server is working correctly.

doc/guide/zodb.tex

 \documentclass{howto}
 
 \title{ZODB/ZEO Programming Guide}
-\release{3.3b2}
+\release{3.3c1}
 \date{\today}
 
 \author{A.M.\ Kuchling}

setup.py

@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ class MyDistribution(Distribution):
 doclines = __doc__.split("\n")
 
 setup(name="ZODB3",
-      version="3.3b2",
+      version="3.3c1",
       maintainer="Zope Corporation",
       maintainer_email="zodb-dev@zope.org",
       url = "http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB",

src/ZEO/__init__.py

@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ ZEO is now part of ZODB; ZODB's home on the web is
 """
 
 # The next line must use double quotes, so release.py recognizes it.
-version = "2.3b2"
+version = "2.3c1"

src/ZEO/version.txt

-2.3b2
+2.3c1

src/ZODB/__init__.py

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 ##############################################################################
 
 # The next line must use double quotes, so release.py recognizes it.
-__version__ = "3.3b2"
+__version__ = "3.3c1"
 
 import sys
 import __builtin__