-
Jakub Sitnicki authored
Today sending a UDP GSO packet from a TUN device results in an EIO error: import fcntl, os, struct from socket import * TUNSETIFF = 0x400454CA IFF_TUN = 0x0001 IFF_NO_PI = 0x1000 UDP_SEGMENT = 103 tun_fd = os.open("/dev/net/tun", os.O_RDWR) ifr = struct.pack("16sH", b"tun0", IFF_TUN | IFF_NO_PI) fcntl.ioctl(tun_fd, TUNSETIFF, ifr) os.system("ip addr add 192.0.2.1/24 dev tun0") os.system("ip link set dev tun0 up") s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM) s.setsockopt(SOL_UDP, UDP_SEGMENT, 1200) s.sendto(b"x" * 3000, ("192.0.2.2", 9)) # EIO This is due to a check in the udp stack if the egress device offers checksum offload. While TUN/TAP devices, by default, don't advertise this capability because it requires support from the TUN/TAP reader. However, the GSO stack has a software fallback for checksum calculation, which we can use. This way we don't force UDP_SEGMENT users to handle the EIO error and implement a segmentation fallback. Lift the restriction so that UDP_SEGMENT can be used with any egress device. We also need to adjust the UDP GSO code to match the GSO stack expectation about ip_summed field, as set in commit 8d63bee6 ("net: avoid skb_warn_bad_offload false positives on UFO"). Otherwise we will hit the bad offload check. Users should, however, expect a potential performance impact when batch-sending packets with UDP_SEGMENT without checksum offload on the egress device. In such case the packet payload is read twice: first during the sendmsg syscall when copying data from user memory, and then in the GSO stack for checksum computation. This double memory read can be less efficient than a regular sendmsg where the checksum is calculated during the initial data copy from user memory. Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240626-linux-udpgso-v2-1-422dfcbd6b48@cloudflare.comSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
10154dbd