When I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression,
there is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume.

$ cat test.sh
prog=bcachefs

$prog subvolume create /mnt/data
$prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots

while true;do
    $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s)
    sleep 1s
done

$ cat /etc/mongodb.conf
systemLog:
  destination: file
  logAppend: true
  path: /mnt/data/mongod.log

storage:
  dbPath: /mnt/data/

lockdep reports:
[ 3437.452330] ======================================================
[ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G            E
[ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.454875]
               but task is already holding lock:
[ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.456009]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 3437.456553]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 3437.457054]
               -> #3 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}:
[ 3437.457507]        down_read+0x3e/0x170
[ 3437.457772]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.458206]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.458498]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.458779]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.459155]
               -> #2 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 3437.459615]        down_read+0x3e/0x170
[ 3437.459878]        bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.460276]        bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.460686]        notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0
[ 3437.461283]        do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0
[ 3437.461555]        path_openat+0xa57/0xce0
[ 3437.461836]        do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160
[ 3437.462116]        do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0
[ 3437.462402]        __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0
[ 3437.462701]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.462982]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.463359]
               -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 3437.463843]        down_write+0x3b/0xc0
[ 3437.464223]        bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.464493]        vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0
[ 3437.464653]        ksys_write+0x69/0xf0
[ 3437.464839]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.465009]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.465231]
               -> #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 3437.465471]        __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0
[ 3437.465656]        lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0
[ 3437.465822]        mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0
[ 3437.465996]        filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.466175]        user_path_create+0x2d/0x50
[ 3437.466352]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.466617]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.466791]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.466957]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.467180]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 3437.467507] Chain exists of:
                 sb_writers#10 --> &c->snapshot_create_lock --> &type->s_umount_key#48

[ 3437.467979]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 3437.468223]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 3437.468405]        ----                    ----
[ 3437.468585]   rlock(&type->s_umount_key#48);
[ 3437.468758]                                lock(&c->snapshot_create_lock);
[ 3437.469030]                                lock(&type->s_umount_key#48);
[ 3437.469291]   rlock(sb_writers#10);
[ 3437.469434]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:
[ 3437.469838]  #0: ffffa0a02ce00a88 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x1e3/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.470294]  #1: ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.470744]
               stack backtrace:
[ 3437.470922] CPU: 7 PID: 35533 Comm: bcachefs Kdump: loaded Tainted: G            E      6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85
[ 3437.471313] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014
[ 3437.471694] Call Trace:
[ 3437.471795]  <TASK>
[ 3437.471884]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90
[ 3437.472035]  check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
[ 3437.472202]  __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0
[ 3437.472369]  lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0
[ 3437.472518]  ? filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.472683]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x97/0x110
[ 3437.472856]  mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0
[ 3437.473025]  ? filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.473204]  filename_create+0x62/0x190
[ 3437.473380]  user_path_create+0x2d/0x50
[ 3437.473555]  bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.473819]  ? lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0
[ 3437.474002]  ? __fget_files+0x2a/0x190
[ 3437.474195]  ? __fget_files+0xbc/0x190
[ 3437.474380]  ? lock_release+0xc5/0x270
[ 3437.474567]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.474764]  ? __pfx_bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [bcachefs]
[ 3437.475090]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0
[ 3437.475277]  do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0
[ 3437.475454]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
[ 3437.475691] RIP: 0033:0x7f2743c313af
======================================================

In __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create(), we grab s_umount unconditionally
and unlock it at the end of the function. There is a comment
"why do we need this lock?" about the lock coming from
commit 42d23732 ("bcachefs: Snapshot creation, deletion")
The reason is that __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create() calls
sync_inodes_sb() which enforce locked s_umount to writeback all dirty
nodes before doing snapshot works.

Fix it by read locking s_umount for snapshotting only and unlocking
s_umount after sync_inodes_sb().
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>