Commit 1026f7d3 authored by Andrew Halaney's avatar Andrew Halaney Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Use dev_err() where possible

dev_err() statements are better to use than pr_err(), so switch to those.

In a similar vein, the check on the dev_req_params pointer here is not
needed, the two places this function is called never pass in a NULL
pointer, so instead of using dev_err() there just remove it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarManivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAsutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent e4ce23fb
......@@ -680,12 +680,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
struct ufs_dev_params ufs_qcom_cap;
int ret = 0;
if (!dev_req_params) {
pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
switch (status) {
case PRE_CHANGE:
ufshcd_init_pwr_dev_param(&ufs_qcom_cap);
......@@ -709,7 +703,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
dev_max_params,
dev_req_params);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
__func__);
goto out;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment