Commit 13c267f0 authored by Thorsten Blum's avatar Thorsten Blum Committed by Boqun Feng

lockdep: Use str_plural() to fix Coccinelle warning

Fixes the following Coccinelle/coccicheck warning reported by
string_choices.cocci:

	opportunity for str_plural(depth)
Acked-by: default avatarWaiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240528120008.403511-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com
parent d5934e76
...@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static void lockdep_print_held_locks(struct task_struct *p) ...@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static void lockdep_print_held_locks(struct task_struct *p)
printk("no locks held by %s/%d.\n", p->comm, task_pid_nr(p)); printk("no locks held by %s/%d.\n", p->comm, task_pid_nr(p));
else else
printk("%d lock%s held by %s/%d:\n", depth, printk("%d lock%s held by %s/%d:\n", depth,
depth > 1 ? "s" : "", p->comm, task_pid_nr(p)); str_plural(depth), p->comm, task_pid_nr(p));
/* /*
* It's not reliable to print a task's held locks if it's not sleeping * It's not reliable to print a task's held locks if it's not sleeping
* and it's not the current task. * and it's not the current task.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment