Commit 29c8ab79 authored by Andy Shevchenko's avatar Andy Shevchenko Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

driver core: Call in reversed order in device_platform_notify_remove()

It's logically correct to call the removal notifiers in the reversed order
as it might be dependent to each other. Luckily, platform_notify_remove()
currently is not used and the others have no dependency use, but theoretically
it's still possible.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230818133654.767986-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent d21fdd07
...@@ -2306,12 +2306,12 @@ static void device_platform_notify(struct device *dev) ...@@ -2306,12 +2306,12 @@ static void device_platform_notify(struct device *dev)
static void device_platform_notify_remove(struct device *dev) static void device_platform_notify_remove(struct device *dev)
{ {
acpi_device_notify_remove(dev); if (platform_notify_remove)
platform_notify_remove(dev);
software_node_notify_remove(dev); software_node_notify_remove(dev);
if (platform_notify_remove) acpi_device_notify_remove(dev);
platform_notify_remove(dev);
} }
/** /**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment