Commit 3af43650 authored by Matthew Auld's avatar Matthew Auld Committed by Rodrigo Vivi

drm/xe: keep pulling mem_access_get further back

Lockdep is unhappy about ggtt->lock -> runtime_pm, where it seems
to think this can somehow get inverted. The ggtt->lock looks like a
potentially sensitive driver lock, so likely a sensible move to never
call the runtime_pm routines while holding it. Actually it looks like
d3cold wants to grab this, so perhaps this can indeed deadlock.

v2:
 - Don't forget about xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_vma(), which now needs
   explicit access_get.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
parent 565ce72e
......@@ -142,12 +142,14 @@ static void xe_ggtt_initial_clear(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
u64 start, end;
/* Display may have allocated inside ggtt, so be careful with clearing here */
xe_device_mem_access_get(ggtt->gt->xe);
mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
drm_mm_for_each_hole(hole, &ggtt->mm, start, end)
xe_ggtt_clear(ggtt, start, end - start);
xe_ggtt_invalidate(ggtt->gt);
mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
xe_device_mem_access_put(ggtt->gt->xe);
}
int xe_ggtt_init(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
......@@ -284,12 +286,14 @@ static int __xe_ggtt_insert_bo_at(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct xe_bo *bo,
if (err)
return err;
xe_device_mem_access_get(ggtt->gt->xe);
mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
err = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(&ggtt->mm, &bo->ggtt_node, bo->size,
alignment, 0, start, end, 0);
if (!err)
xe_ggtt_map_bo(ggtt, bo);
mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
xe_device_mem_access_put(ggtt->gt->xe);
return err;
}
......@@ -318,6 +322,7 @@ int xe_ggtt_insert_bo(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct xe_bo *bo)
void xe_ggtt_remove_node(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct drm_mm_node *node)
{
xe_device_mem_access_get(ggtt->gt->xe);
mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
xe_ggtt_clear(ggtt, node->start, node->size);
......@@ -327,6 +332,7 @@ void xe_ggtt_remove_node(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct drm_mm_node *node)
xe_ggtt_invalidate(ggtt->gt);
mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
xe_device_mem_access_put(ggtt->gt->xe);
}
void xe_ggtt_remove_bo(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct xe_bo *bo)
......
......@@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
* need to be updated.
*/
xe_device_mem_access_get(gt->xe);
mutex_lock(&guc->ct.lock);
seqno = gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno;
if (fence) {
......@@ -143,7 +142,6 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
if (ret < 0 && fence)
invalidation_fence_signal(fence);
mutex_unlock(&guc->ct.lock);
xe_device_mem_access_put(gt->xe);
return ret;
}
......@@ -196,7 +194,7 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_vma(struct xe_gt *gt,
struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
#define MAX_TLB_INVALIDATION_LEN 7
u32 action[MAX_TLB_INVALIDATION_LEN];
int len = 0;
int len = 0, ret;
XE_BUG_ON(!vma);
......@@ -250,7 +248,11 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_vma(struct xe_gt *gt,
XE_BUG_ON(len > MAX_TLB_INVALIDATION_LEN);
return send_tlb_invalidation(&gt->uc.guc, fence, action, len);
xe_device_mem_access_get(gt->xe);
ret = send_tlb_invalidation(&gt->uc.guc, fence, action, len);
xe_device_mem_access_put(gt->xe);
return ret;
}
static bool tlb_invalidation_seqno_past(struct xe_gt *gt, int seqno)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment