[ARM PATCH] 1932/1: fix comment about cache handling syscall
Patch from Nicolas Pitre Let's make it coherent with what the actual code is doing and has always done, even in 2.4. Nobody complained about this so let's just fix the comment. The most natural usage pattern for this is a base address and a size so it's more efficient to have an exclusive end address anyway.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment