Merge patch series "ISA string parser cleanups"
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> says: From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Here are some bits that were discussed with Drew on the "should we allow caps" threads that I have now created patches for: - splitting of riscv_of_processor_hartid() into two distinct functions, one for use purely during early boot, prior to the establishment of the possible-cpus mask & another to fit the other current use-cases - that then allows us to then completely skip some validation of the hartid in the parser - the biggest diff in the series is a rework of the comments in the parser, as I have mostly found the existing (sparse) ones to not be all that helpful whenever I have to go back and look at it - from writing the comments, I found a conditional doing a bit of a dance that I found counter-intuitive, so I've had a go at making that match what I would expect a little better - `i` implies 4 other extensions, so add them as extensions and set them for the craic. Sure why not like... * b4-shazam-merge: RISC-V: always report presence of extensions formerly part of the base ISA dt-bindings: riscv: explicitly mention assumption of Zicntr & Zihpm support RISC-V: remove decrement/increment dance in ISA string parser RISC-V: rework comments in ISA string parser RISC-V: validate riscv,isa at boot, not during ISA string parsing RISC-V: split early & late of_node to hartid mapping RISC-V: simplify register width check in ISA string parsing Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230607-audacity-overhaul-82bb867a825f@spudSigned-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment