Commit 4ac0567e authored by Vladimir Oltean's avatar Vladimir Oltean Committed by Jakub Kicinski

net: dsa: sja1105: break dependency between dsa_port_is_sja1105 and switch driver

It's nice to be able to test a tagging protocol with dsa_loop, but not
at the cost of losing the ability of building the tagging protocol and
switch driver as modules, because as things stand, there is a circular
dependency between the two. Tagging protocol drivers cannot depend on
switch drivers, that is a hard fact.

The reasoning behind the blamed patch was that accessing dp->priv should
first make sure that the structure behind that pointer is what we really
think it is.

Currently the "sja1105" and "sja1110" tagging protocols only operate
with the sja1105 switch driver, just like any other tagging protocol and
switch combination. The only way to mix and match them is by modifying
the code, and this applies to dsa_loop as well (by default that uses
DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE). So while in principle there is an issue, in
practice there isn't one.

Until we extend dsa_loop to allow user space configuration, treat the
problem as a non-issue and just say that DSA ports found by tag_sja1105
are always sja1105 ports, which is in fact true. But keep the
dsa_port_is_sja1105 function so that it's easy to patch it during
testing, and rely on dead code elimination.

Fixes: 994d2cbb ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105: be dsa_loop-safe")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210908220834.d7gmtnwrorhharna@skbuf/Signed-off-by: default avatarVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 28da0555
...@@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ static void sja1105_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds) ...@@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ static void sja1105_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
sja1105_static_config_free(&priv->static_config); sja1105_static_config_free(&priv->static_config);
} }
const struct dsa_switch_ops sja1105_switch_ops = { static const struct dsa_switch_ops sja1105_switch_ops = {
.get_tag_protocol = sja1105_get_tag_protocol, .get_tag_protocol = sja1105_get_tag_protocol,
.setup = sja1105_setup, .setup = sja1105_setup,
.teardown = sja1105_teardown, .teardown = sja1105_teardown,
...@@ -3166,7 +3166,6 @@ const struct dsa_switch_ops sja1105_switch_ops = { ...@@ -3166,7 +3166,6 @@ const struct dsa_switch_ops sja1105_switch_ops = {
.port_bridge_tx_fwd_offload = dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload, .port_bridge_tx_fwd_offload = dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload,
.port_bridge_tx_fwd_unoffload = dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_unoffload, .port_bridge_tx_fwd_unoffload = dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_unoffload,
}; };
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sja1105_switch_ops);
static const struct of_device_id sja1105_dt_ids[]; static const struct of_device_id sja1105_dt_ids[];
......
...@@ -88,22 +88,9 @@ static inline s64 sja1105_ticks_to_ns(s64 ticks) ...@@ -88,22 +88,9 @@ static inline s64 sja1105_ticks_to_ns(s64 ticks)
return ticks * SJA1105_TICK_NS; return ticks * SJA1105_TICK_NS;
} }
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_SJA1105)
extern const struct dsa_switch_ops sja1105_switch_ops;
static inline bool dsa_port_is_sja1105(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
return dp->ds->ops == &sja1105_switch_ops;
}
#else
static inline bool dsa_port_is_sja1105(struct dsa_port *dp) static inline bool dsa_port_is_sja1105(struct dsa_port *dp)
{ {
return false; return true;
} }
#endif
#endif /* _NET_DSA_SJA1105_H */ #endif /* _NET_DSA_SJA1105_H */
...@@ -138,7 +138,6 @@ config NET_DSA_TAG_LAN9303 ...@@ -138,7 +138,6 @@ config NET_DSA_TAG_LAN9303
config NET_DSA_TAG_SJA1105 config NET_DSA_TAG_SJA1105
tristate "Tag driver for NXP SJA1105 switches" tristate "Tag driver for NXP SJA1105 switches"
depends on NET_DSA_SJA1105 || !NET_DSA_SJA1105
select PACKING select PACKING
help help
Say Y or M if you want to enable support for tagging frames with the Say Y or M if you want to enable support for tagging frames with the
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment