Commit 534cc628 authored by Jean Delvare's avatar Jean Delvare Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

firmware: dmi_scan: Only honor end-of-table for 64-bit tables

commit 17cd5bd5 upstream.

A 32-bit entry point to a DMI table says how many structures the table
contains. The SMBIOS specification explicitly says that end-of-table
markers should be ignored if they are not actually at the end of the
DMI table. So only honor the end-of-table marker for tables accessed
through 64-bit entry points, as they do not specify a structure count.

Fixes: fc430262 ("dmi: add support for SMBIOS 3.0 64-bit entry point")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Acked-by: default avatarArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 01fed233
......@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ static void dmi_table(u8 *buf,
/*
* Stop when we have seen all the items the table claimed to have
* (SMBIOS < 3.0 only) OR we reach an end-of-table marker OR we run
* off the end of the table (should never happen but sometimes does
* on bogus implementations.)
* (SMBIOS < 3.0 only) OR we reach an end-of-table marker (SMBIOS
* >= 3.0 only) OR we run off the end of the table (should never
* happen but sometimes does on bogus implementations.)
*/
while ((!dmi_num || i < dmi_num) &&
(data - buf + sizeof(struct dmi_header)) <= dmi_len) {
......@@ -110,8 +110,13 @@ static void dmi_table(u8 *buf,
/*
* 7.45 End-of-Table (Type 127) [SMBIOS reference spec v3.0.0]
* For tables behind a 64-bit entry point, we have no item
* count and no exact table length, so stop on end-of-table
* marker. For tables behind a 32-bit entry point, we have
* seen OEM structures behind the end-of-table marker on
* some systems, so don't trust it.
*/
if (dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_END_OF_TABLE)
if (!dmi_num && dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_END_OF_TABLE)
break;
data += 2;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment