Commit 593047c8 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by Kamal Mostafa

tcp: fix tcpi_segs_in after connection establishment

commit a9d99ce2 upstream.

If final packet (ACK) of 3WHS is lost, it appears we do not properly
account the following incoming segment into tcpi_segs_in

While we are at it, starts segs_in with one, to count the SYN packet.

We do not yet count number of SYN we received for a request sock, we
might add this someday.

packetdrill script showing proper behavior after fix :

// Tests tcpi_segs_in when 3rd packet (ACK) of 3WHS is lost
0.000 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
   +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
   +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
   +0 listen(3, 1) = 0

   +0 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,sackOK,nop,nop>
   +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
+.020 < P. 1:1001(1000) ack 1 win 32792

   +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4

+.000 %{ assert tcpi_segs_in == 2, 'tcpi_segs_in=%d' % tcpi_segs_in }%

Fixes: 2efd055c ("tcp: add tcpi_segs_in and tcpi_segs_out to tcp_info")
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
parent 244c83b7
...@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, ...@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
newtp->rcv_wup = newtp->copied_seq = newtp->rcv_wup = newtp->copied_seq =
newtp->rcv_nxt = treq->rcv_isn + 1; newtp->rcv_nxt = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
newtp->segs_in = 0; newtp->segs_in = 1;
newtp->snd_sml = newtp->snd_una = newtp->snd_sml = newtp->snd_una =
newtp->snd_nxt = newtp->snd_up = treq->snt_isn + 1; newtp->snd_nxt = newtp->snd_up = treq->snt_isn + 1;
...@@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ int tcp_child_process(struct sock *parent, struct sock *child, ...@@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ int tcp_child_process(struct sock *parent, struct sock *child,
int ret = 0; int ret = 0;
int state = child->sk_state; int state = child->sk_state;
tcp_sk(child)->segs_in += max_t(u16, 1, skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs);
if (!sock_owned_by_user(child)) { if (!sock_owned_by_user(child)) {
ret = tcp_rcv_state_process(child, skb, tcp_hdr(skb), ret = tcp_rcv_state_process(child, skb, tcp_hdr(skb),
skb->len); skb->len);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment