rfs: annotate lockless accesses to RFS sock flow table
Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() on accesses to the sock flow table. This also prevents a (smart ?) compiler to remove the condition in: if (table->ents[index] != newval) table->ents[index] = newval; We need the condition to avoid dirtying a shared cache line. Fixes: fec5e652 ("rfs: Receive Flow Steering") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment