Commit 5e25eb25 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner Committed by Borislav Petkov (AMD)

x86/topology: Handle the !APIC case gracefully

If there is no local APIC enumerated and registered then the topology
bitmaps are empty. Therefore, topology_init_possible_cpus() will die with
a division by zero exception.

Prevent this by registering a fake APIC id to populate the topology
bitmap. This also allows to use all topology query interfaces
unconditionally. It does not affect the actual APIC code because either
the local APIC address was not registered or no local APIC could be
detected.

Fixes: f1f758a8 ("x86/topology: Add a mechanism to track topology via APIC IDs")
Reported-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reported-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240322185305.242709302@linutronix.de
parent 7af541ce
...@@ -415,6 +415,17 @@ void __init topology_init_possible_cpus(void) ...@@ -415,6 +415,17 @@ void __init topology_init_possible_cpus(void)
unsigned int total = assigned + disabled; unsigned int total = assigned + disabled;
u32 apicid, firstid; u32 apicid, firstid;
/*
* If there was no APIC registered, then fake one so that the
* topology bitmap is populated. That ensures that the code below
* is valid and the various query interfaces can be used
* unconditionally. This does not affect the actual APIC code in
* any way because either the local APIC address has not been
* registered or the local APIC was disabled on the command line.
*/
if (topo_info.boot_cpu_apic_id == BAD_APICID)
topology_register_boot_apic(0);
if (!restrict_to_up()) { if (!restrict_to_up()) {
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(assigned > nr_cpu_ids)) { if (WARN_ON_ONCE(assigned > nr_cpu_ids)) {
disabled += assigned - nr_cpu_ids; disabled += assigned - nr_cpu_ids;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment