Commit 719038de authored by Borislav Petkov's avatar Borislav Petkov Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/intel/cacheinfo: Shut up last long-standing warning

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c: In function ‘init_intel_cacheinfo’:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c:642:28: warning: ‘this_leaf.size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c:643:29: warning: ‘this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

This keeps on happening during randbuilds and the compiler is
wrong here:

In the case where cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs() returns 0, both
this_leaf.size and this_leaf.eax get initialized. In the case
where the CPUID leaf doesn't contain valid cache info, we error
out which init_intel_cacheinfo() handles correctly without
touching the abovementioned fields.

So shut up the warning by clearing out the struct which we hand
down.

While at it, reverse error handling and gain one indentation
level.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1370710095-20547-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 4d067d8e
......@@ -618,36 +618,34 @@ unsigned int __cpuinit init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* parameters cpuid leaf to find the cache details
*/
for (i = 0; i < num_cache_leaves; i++) {
struct _cpuid4_info_regs this_leaf;
struct _cpuid4_info_regs this_leaf = {};
int retval;
retval = cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(i, &this_leaf);
if (retval >= 0) {
switch (this_leaf.eax.split.level) {
case 1:
if (this_leaf.eax.split.type ==
CACHE_TYPE_DATA)
new_l1d = this_leaf.size/1024;
else if (this_leaf.eax.split.type ==
CACHE_TYPE_INST)
new_l1i = this_leaf.size/1024;
break;
case 2:
new_l2 = this_leaf.size/1024;
num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
l2_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
break;
case 3:
new_l3 = this_leaf.size/1024;
num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
index_msb = get_count_order(
num_threads_sharing);
l3_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
break;
default:
break;
}
if (retval < 0)
continue;
switch (this_leaf.eax.split.level) {
case 1:
if (this_leaf.eax.split.type == CACHE_TYPE_DATA)
new_l1d = this_leaf.size/1024;
else if (this_leaf.eax.split.type == CACHE_TYPE_INST)
new_l1i = this_leaf.size/1024;
break;
case 2:
new_l2 = this_leaf.size/1024;
num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
l2_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
break;
case 3:
new_l3 = this_leaf.size/1024;
num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
l3_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
break;
default:
break;
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment