Commit 7d6d4aaf authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König Committed by Thierry Reding

pwm: berlin: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped

As the last call to berlin_pwm_apply() might have exited early if
state->enabled was false, the values for period and duty_cycle stored in
pwm->state might not have been written to hardware and it must be
ensured that they are configured before enabling the PWM.

Fixes: 30dffb42 ("pwm: berlin: Implement .apply() callback")
Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
parent 25f70b8f
......@@ -190,12 +190,9 @@ static int berlin_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return 0;
}
if (state->period != pwm->state.period ||
state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle) {
err = berlin_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
if (err)
return err;
}
err = berlin_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
if (err)
return err;
if (!enabled)
return berlin_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment