Commit 96c1c0cf authored by Abel Wu's avatar Abel Wu Committed by Peter Zijlstra

sched/fair: Cleanup for SIS_PROP

The sched-domain of this cpu is only used for some heuristics when
SIS_PROP is enabled, and it should be irrelevant whether the local
sd_llc is valid or not, since all we care about is target sd_llc
if !SIS_PROP.

Access the local domain only when there is a need.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAbel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907112000.1854-6-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
parent 398ba2b0
......@@ -6396,19 +6396,19 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share;
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
int this = smp_processor_id();
struct sched_domain *this_sd;
struct sched_domain *this_sd = NULL;
u64 time = 0;
this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
if (!this_sd)
return -1;
cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
unsigned long now = jiffies;
this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
if (!this_sd)
return -1;
/*
* If we're busy, the assumption that the last idle period
* predicts the future is flawed; age away the remaining
......@@ -6462,7 +6462,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
if (has_idle_core)
set_idle_cores(target, false);
if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && this_sd && !has_idle_core) {
time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment