Merge tag 'wq-for-6.11-rc4-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq

Pull workqueue fixes from Tejun Heo:
 "Nothing too interesting. One patch to remove spurious warning and
  others to address static checker warnings"

* tag 'wq-for-6.11-rc4-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq:
  workqueue: Correct declaration of cpu_pwq in struct workqueue_struct
  workqueue: Fix spruious data race in __flush_work()
  workqueue: Remove incorrect "WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry));" from dying worker
  workqueue: Fix UBSAN 'subtraction overflow' error in shift_and_mask()
  workqueue: doc: Fix function name, remove markers

Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst

@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ Some users depend on strict execution ordering where only one work item
 is in flight at any given time and the work items are processed in
 queueing order. While the combination of ``@max_active`` of 1 and
 ``WQ_UNBOUND`` used to achieve this behavior, this is no longer the
-case. Use ``alloc_ordered_queue()`` instead.
+case. Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead.
 
 
 Example Execution Scenarios

kernel/workqueue.c

@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
 
 	/* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */
 	unsigned int		flags ____cacheline_aligned; /* WQ: WQ_* flags */
-	struct pool_workqueue __percpu __rcu **cpu_pwq; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
+	struct pool_workqueue __rcu * __percpu *cpu_pwq; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
 	struct wq_node_nr_active *node_nr_active[]; /* I: per-node nr_active */
 };
 
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_work_pool(struct work_struct *work)
 
 static unsigned long shift_and_mask(unsigned long v, u32 shift, u32 bits)
 {
-	return (v >> shift) & ((1 << bits) - 1);
+	return (v >> shift) & ((1U << bits) - 1);
 }
 
 static void work_offqd_unpack(struct work_offq_data *offqd, unsigned long data)
@@ -3351,7 +3351,6 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
 		set_pf_worker(false);
 
 		ida_free(&pool->worker_ida, worker->id);
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry));
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -4167,7 +4166,6 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
 static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
 {
 	struct wq_barrier barr;
-	unsigned long data;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
 		return false;
@@ -4185,15 +4183,18 @@ static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
 	 * was queued on a BH workqueue, we also know that it was running in the
 	 * BH context and thus can be busy-waited.
 	 */
-	data = *work_data_bits(work);
-	if (from_cancel &&
-	    !WARN_ON_ONCE(data & WORK_STRUCT_PWQ) && (data & WORK_OFFQ_BH)) {
+	if (from_cancel) {
+		unsigned long data = *work_data_bits(work);
+
+		if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(data & WORK_STRUCT_PWQ) &&
+		    (data & WORK_OFFQ_BH)) {
 			/*
-		 * On RT, prevent a live lock when %current preempted soft
-		 * interrupt processing or prevents ksoftirqd from running by
-		 * keeping flipping BH. If the BH work item runs on a different
-		 * CPU then this has no effect other than doing the BH
-		 * disable/enable dance for nothing. This is copied from
+			 * On RT, prevent a live lock when %current preempted
+			 * soft interrupt processing or prevents ksoftirqd from
+			 * running by keeping flipping BH. If the BH work item
+			 * runs on a different CPU then this has no effect other
+			 * than doing the BH disable/enable dance for nothing.
+			 * This is copied from
 			 * kernel/softirq.c::tasklet_unlock_spin_wait().
 			 */
 			while (!try_wait_for_completion(&barr.done)) {
@@ -4204,10 +4205,13 @@ static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
 					cpu_relax();
 				}
 			}
-	} else {
-		wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
+			goto out_destroy;
 		}
+	}
+
+	wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
 
+out_destroy:
 	destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
 	return true;
 }