bcachefs: Fix snapshot_create_lock lock ordering
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc2-ktest-00018-gebd1d148b278 #144 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
fio/1345 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88813e200ab8 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch2_truncate+0x76/0xf0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888105a1fa38 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_truncate+0x7b/0xc0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x3d/0xd0
bch2_write_iter+0x1c0/0x10f0
vfs_write+0x24a/0x560
__x64_sys_pwrite64+0x77/0xb0
x64_sys_call+0x17e5/0x1ab0
do_syscall_64+0x68/0x130
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
-> #1 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}:
mnt_want_write+0x4a/0x1d0
filename_create+0x69/0x1a0
user_path_create+0x38/0x50
bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x315/0xbf0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x297/0xaf0
x64_sys_call+0x10cb/0x1ab0
do_syscall_64+0x68/0x130
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
-> #0 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1445/0x25b0
lock_acquire+0xbd/0x2b0
down_read+0x40/0x180
bch2_truncate+0x76/0xf0
bchfs_truncate+0x240/0x3f0
bch2_setattr+0x7b/0xb0
notify_change+0x322/0x4b0
do_truncate+0x8b/0xc0
do_ftruncate+0x110/0x270
__x64_sys_ftruncate+0x43/0x80
x64_sys_call+0x1373/0x1ab0
do_syscall_64+0x68/0x130
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&c->snapshot_create_lock --> sb_writers#10 --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13);
lock(sb_writers#10);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13);
rlock(&c->snapshot_create_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment