Commit e75d18ce authored by Sudeep Holla's avatar Sudeep Holla Committed by Will Deacon

arm64: cacheinfo: Fix incorrect assignment of signed error value to unsigned fw_level

Though acpi_find_last_cache_level() always returned signed value and the
document states it will return any errors caused by lack of a PPTT table,
it never returned negative values before.

Commit 0c80f9e1 ("ACPI: PPTT: Leave the table mapped for the runtime usage")
however changed it by returning -ENOENT if no PPTT was found. The value
returned from acpi_find_last_cache_level() is then assigned to unsigned
fw_level.

It will result in the number of cache leaves calculated incorrectly as
a huge value which will then cause the following warning from __alloc_pages
as the order would be great than MAX_ORDER because of incorrect and huge
cache leaves value.

  |  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/page_alloc.c:5407 __alloc_pages+0x74/0x314
  |  Modules linked in:
  |  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0-10393-g7c2a8d3ac4c0 #73
  |  pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
  |  pc : __alloc_pages+0x74/0x314
  |  lr : alloc_pages+0xe8/0x318
  |  Call trace:
  |   __alloc_pages+0x74/0x314
  |   alloc_pages+0xe8/0x318
  |   kmalloc_order_trace+0x68/0x1dc
  |   __kmalloc+0x240/0x338
  |   detect_cache_attributes+0xe0/0x56c
  |   update_siblings_masks+0x38/0x284
  |   store_cpu_topology+0x78/0x84
  |   smp_prepare_cpus+0x48/0x134
  |   kernel_init_freeable+0xc4/0x14c
  |   kernel_init+0x2c/0x1b4
  |   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fix the same by changing fw_level to be signed integer and return the
error from init_cache_level() early in case of error.
Reported-and-Tested-by: default avatarBruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220808084640.3165368-1-sudeep.holla@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
parent e89d120c
...@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, ...@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
{ {
unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, fw_level; unsigned int ctype, level, leaves;
int fw_level;
struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
for (level = 1, leaves = 0; level <= MAX_CACHE_LEVEL; level++) { for (level = 1, leaves = 0; level <= MAX_CACHE_LEVEL; level++) {
...@@ -63,6 +64,9 @@ int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -63,6 +64,9 @@ int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
else else
fw_level = acpi_find_last_cache_level(cpu); fw_level = acpi_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
if (fw_level < 0)
return fw_level;
if (level < fw_level) { if (level < fw_level) {
/* /*
* some external caches not specified in CLIDR_EL1 * some external caches not specified in CLIDR_EL1
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment