Commit e79cf889 authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara Committed by Jens Axboe

bfq: Remove superfluous conversion from RQ_BIC()

We store struct bfq_io_cq pointer in rq->elv.priv[0] in bfq_init_rq().
Thus a call to icq_to_bic() in RQ_BIC() is wrong. Luckily it does no
harm currently because struct io_iq is the first one in struct
bfq_io_cq.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-3-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent c5ac56bb
...@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static const unsigned long bfq_activation_stable_merging = 600; ...@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static const unsigned long bfq_activation_stable_merging = 600;
*/ */
static const unsigned long bfq_late_stable_merging = 600; static const unsigned long bfq_late_stable_merging = 600;
#define RQ_BIC(rq) icq_to_bic((rq)->elv.priv[0]) #define RQ_BIC(rq) ((struct bfq_io_cq *)((rq)->elv.priv[0]))
#define RQ_BFQQ(rq) ((rq)->elv.priv[1]) #define RQ_BFQQ(rq) ((rq)->elv.priv[1])
struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync) struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment