- 16 Dec, 2021 36 commits
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
There is no reason to walk the MSI descriptors to retrieve the interrupt number for a device. Use msi_get_virq() instead. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.329792721@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Just use the core function msi_get_virq(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.269468319@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Storing a pointer to the MSI descriptor just to track the Linux interrupt number is daft. Just store the interrupt number and be done with it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.207838579@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
No point in retrieving the MSI descriptors. Just query the Linux interrupt number. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.148331680@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Let the core code fiddle with the MSI descriptor retrieval. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.089008198@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Let the core code fiddle with the MSI descriptor retrieval. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.029143589@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Storing a pointer to the MSI descriptor just to keep track of the Linux interrupt number is daft. Use msi_get_virq() instead. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.970099984@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Replace open coded MSI descriptor chasing and use the proper accessor functions instead. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.900929381@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Use msi_get_vector() and handle the return value to be compatible. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.841243231@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
This allows drivers to retrieve the Linux interrupt number instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors. msi_get_virq() returns the Linux interrupt number or 0 in case that there is no entry for the given MSI index. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.780824745@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Set the domain info flag and remove the check. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.720998720@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Provide a domain info flag which makes the core code check for a contiguous MSI-X index on allocation. That's simpler than checking it at some other domain callback in architecture code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.662401116@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The usage of msi_desc::pci::entry_nr is confusing at best. It's the index into the MSI[X] descriptor table. Use msi_desc::msi_index which is shared between all MSI incarnations instead of having a PCI specific storage for no value. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.602911509@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Use the common msi_index member and get rid of the pointless wrapper struct. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.540704224@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Use the common msi_index member and get rid of the pointless wrapper struct. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.477386185@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Use the common msi_index member and get rid of the pointless wrapper struct. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.413638645@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
All non PCI/MSI usage variants have data structures in struct msi_desc with only one member: xxx_index. PCI/MSI has a entry_nr member. Add a common msi_index member to struct msi_desc so all implementations can share it which allows further consolidation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.350967317@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Storing the platform private data in a MSI descriptor is sloppy at best. The data belongs to the device and not to the descriptor. Add a pointer to struct msi_device_data and store the pointer there. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.287680528@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
It's hard to distinguish what platform_msi_domain_alloc() and platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs() are about. Make the distinction more explicit and add comments which explain the use cases properly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.228706214@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
No more users. Refactor the core code accordingly and move the global interface under CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.168362229@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Set the domain info flag and remove the local sysfs code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.109408832@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Set the domain info flag which makes the core code handle sysfs groups and put an explicit invocation into the legacy code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.048612053@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add new allocation functions which can be activated by domain info flags. They store the groups pointer in struct msi_device_data. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.988659194@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Allocate the MSI device data on first invocation of the allocation function. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.928842960@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Allocate the MSI device data on first invocation of the allocation function. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.867985931@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Allocate the MSI device data on first invocation of the allocation function for platform MSI private data. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.805529729@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Allocate MSI device data on first use, i.e. when a PCI driver invokes one of the PCI/MSI enablement functions. Add a wrapper function to ensure that the ordering vs. pcim_msi_release() is correct. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r1adrdje.ffs@tglx
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The MSI core will introduce runtime allocation of MSI related data. This data will be devres managed and has to be set up before enabling PCI/MSI[-X]. This would introduce an ordering issue vs. pcim_release(). The setup order is: pcim_enable_device() devres_alloc(pcim_release...); ... pci_irq_alloc() msi_setup_device_data() devres_alloc(msi_device_data_release, ...) and once the device is released these release functions are invoked in the opposite order: msi_device_data_release() ... pcim_release() pci_disable_msi[x]() which is obviously wrong, because pci_disable_msi[x]() requires the MSI data to be available to tear down the MSI[-X] interrupts. Remove the MSI[-X] teardown from pcim_release() and add an explicit action to be installed on the attempt of enabling PCI/MSI[-X]. This allows the MSI core data allocation to be ordered correctly in a subsequent step. Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tuf9rdoj.ffs@tglx
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Create struct msi_device_data and add a pointer of that type to struct dev_msi_info, which is part of struct device. Provide an allocator function which can be invoked from the MSI interrupt allocation code pathes. Add a properties field to the data structure as a first member so the allocation size is not zero bytes. The field will be uses later on. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.676660809@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The only unconditional part of MSI data in struct device is the irqdomain pointer. Everything else can be allocated on demand. Create a data structure and move the irqdomain pointer into it. The other MSI specific parts are going to be removed from struct device in later steps. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.617178827@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.556202506@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.493922179@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
to determine whether this is MSI or MSIX instead of consulting MSI descriptors. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.434156196@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.372357371@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.311410967@linutronix.de
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
There are quite some places which retrieve the first MSI descriptor to evaluate whether the setup is for MSI or MSI-X. That's required because pci_dev::msi[x]_enabled is only set when the setup completed successfully. There is no real reason why msi[x]_enabled can't be set at the beginning of the setup sequence and cleared in case of a failure. Implement that so the MSI descriptor evaluations can be converted to simple property queries. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.250049810@linutronix.de
-
- 15 Dec, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
The #ifdef check around the definition doesn't match the one around the declaration, leading to a link failure when CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 is enabled but CONFIG_XEN_PV_DOM0 is not: x86_64-linux-ld: arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.o: in function `arch_restore_msi_irqs': msi.c:(.text+0x29a): undefined reference to `xen_initdom_restore_msi' Change the declaration to use the same check that was already present around the function definition. Fixes: ae72f315 ("PCI/MSI: Make arch_restore_msi_irqs() less horrible.") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211215140209.451379-1-arnd@kernel.org
-
- 14 Dec, 2021 3 commits
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
to pick up the PCI/MSI-x fixes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL is set in the MSI-X control register at MSI-X interrupt setup time. It's cleared on success, but the error handling path only clears the PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE bit. That's incorrect as the reset state of the PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL bit is zero. That can be observed via lspci: Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=67 Masked+ Clear the bit in the error path to restore the reset state. Fixes: 43855395 ("PCI/MSI: Enable and mask MSI-X early") Reported-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tufevoqx.ffs@tglx
-
Stefan Roese authored
Masking all unused MSI-X entries is done to ensure that a crash kernel starts from a clean slate, which correponds to the reset state of the device as defined in the PCI-E specificion 3.0 and later: Vector Control for MSI-X Table Entries -------------------------------------- "00: Mask bit: When this bit is set, the function is prohibited from sending a message using this MSI-X Table entry. ... This bit’s state after reset is 1 (entry is masked)." A Marvell NVME device fails to deliver MSI interrupts after trying to enable MSI-X interrupts due to that masking. It seems to take the MSI-X mask bits into account even when MSI-X is disabled. While not specification compliant, this can be cured by moving the masking into the success path, so that the MSI-X table entries stay in device reset state when the MSI-X setup fails. [ tglx: Move it into the success path, add comment and amend changelog ] Fixes: aa8092c1d1f1 ("PCI/MSI: Mask all unused MSI-X entries") Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210161025.3287927-1-sr@denx.de
-