Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 07 Apr, 2022 3 commits
  3. 05 Apr, 2022 3 commits
    • Peter Zijlstra's avatar
      objtool: Fix SLS validation for kcov tail-call replacement · 7a53f408
      Peter Zijlstra authored 
      Since not all compilers have a function attribute to disable KCOV
instrumentation, objtool can rewrite KCOV instrumentation in noinstr
functions as per commit:

  f56dae88 ("objtool: Handle __sanitize_cov*() tail calls")

However, this has subtle interaction with the SLS validation from
commit:

  1cc1e4c8 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")

In that when a tail-call instrucion is replaced with a RET an
additional INT3 instruction is also written, but is not represented in
the decoded instruction stream.

This then leads to false positive missing INT3 objtool warnings in
noinstr code.

Instead of adding additional struct instruction objects, mark the RET
instruction with retpoline_safe to suppress the warning (since we know
there really is an INT3).

Fixes: 1cc1e4c8 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220323230712.GA8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
      7a53f408
    • Peter Zijlstra's avatar
      objtool: Fix IBT tail-call detection · d139bca4
      Peter Zijlstra authored 
      Objtool reports:

  arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-x86_64.o: warning: objtool: poly1305_blocks_avx() falls through to next function poly1305_blocks_x86_64()
  arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-x86_64.o: warning: objtool: poly1305_emit_avx() falls through to next function poly1305_emit_x86_64()
  arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-x86_64.o: warning: objtool: poly1305_blocks_avx2() falls through to next function poly1305_blocks_x86_64()

Which reads like:

0000000000000040 <poly1305_blocks_x86_64>:
	 40:       f3 0f 1e fa             endbr64
	...

0000000000000400 <poly1305_blocks_avx>:
	400:       f3 0f 1e fa             endbr64
	404:       44 8b 47 14             mov    0x14(%rdi),%r8d
	408:       48 81 fa 80 00 00 00    cmp    $0x80,%rdx
	40f:       73 09                   jae    41a <poly1305_blocks_avx+0x1a>
	411:       45 85 c0                test   %r8d,%r8d
	414:       0f 84 2a fc ff ff       je     44 <poly1305_blocks_x86_64+0x4>
	...

These are simple conditional tail-calls and *should* be recognised as
such by objtool, however due to a mistake in commit 08f87a93
("objtool: Validate IBT assumptions") this is failing.

Specifically, the jump_dest is +4, this means the instruction pointed
at will not be ENDBR and as such it will fail the second clause of
is_first_func_insn() that was supposed to capture this exact case.

Instead, have is_first_func_insn() look at the previous instruction.

Fixes: 08f87a93 ("objtool: Validate IBT assumptions")
Reported-by: default avatarStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322115125.811582125@infradead.org
      d139bca4
    • Vincent Mailhol's avatar
      x86/bug: Prevent shadowing in __WARN_FLAGS · 9ce02f0f
      Vincent Mailhol authored 
      The macro __WARN_FLAGS() uses a local variable named "f". This being a
common name, there is a risk of shadowing other variables.

For example, GCC would yield:

| In file included from ./include/linux/bug.h:5,
|                  from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:14,
|                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5,
|                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11,
|                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:22,
|                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:5,
|                  from ./include/linux/timex.h:65,
|                  from ./include/linux/time32.h:13,
|                  from ./include/linux/time.h:60,
|                  from ./include/linux/stat.h:19,
|                  from ./include/linux/module.h:13,
|                  from virt/lib/irqbypass.mod.c:1:
| ./include/linux/rcupdate.h: In function 'rcu_head_after_call_rcu':
| ./arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:80:21: warning: declaration of 'f' shadows a parameter [-Wshadow]
|    80 |         __auto_type f = BUGFLAG_WARNING|(flags);                \
|       |                     ^
| ./include/asm-generic/bug.h:106:17: note: in expansion of macro '__WARN_FLAGS'
|   106 |                 __WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_ONCE |                     \
|       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~
| ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:1007:9: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ON_ONCE'
|  1007 |         WARN_ON_ONCE(func != (rcu_callback_t)~0L);
|       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
| In file included from ./include/linux/rbtree.h:24,
|                  from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:11,
|                  from ./include/linux/buildid.h:5,
|                  from ./include/linux/module.h:14,
|                  from virt/lib/irqbypass.mod.c:1:
| ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:1001:62: note: shadowed declaration is here
|  1001 | rcu_head_after_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t f)
|       |                                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^

For reference, sparse also warns about it, c.f. [1].

This patch renames the variable from f to __flags (with two underscore
prefixes as suggested in the Linux kernel coding style [2]) in order
to prevent collisions.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAFGhKbyifH1a+nAMCvWM88TK6fpNPdzFtUXPmRGnnQeePV+1sw@mail.gmail.com/

[2] Linux kernel coding style, section 12) Macros, Enums and RTL,
paragraph 5) namespace collisions when defining local variables in
macros resembling functions
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#macros-enums-and-rtl

Fixes: bfb1a7c9 ("x86/bug: Merge annotate_reachable() into_BUG_FLAGS() asm")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220324023742.106546-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr
      9ce02f0f
  5. 04 Apr, 2022 1 commit
  7. 03 Apr, 2022 8 commits
  9. 02 Apr, 2022 25 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7