- 24 Sep, 2023 23 commits
-
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by:
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove(). Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
- 06 Sep, 2023 17 commits
-
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-22-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with sysfs_create_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups pointer in the driver structure. Acked-by:
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com> Reviewed-by:
-
