- 30 Nov, 2022 40 commits
-
-
Mel Gorman authored
Patch series "Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations", v3. This patch (of 2): free_unref_page_list() has neglected to remove pages properly from the list of pages to free since forever. It works by coincidence because list_add happened to do the right thing adding the pages to just the PCP lists. However, a later patch added pages to either the PCP list or the zone list but only properly deleted the page from the list in one path leading to list corruption and a subsequent failure. As a preparation patch, always delete the pages from one list properly before adding to another. On its own, this fixes nothing although it adds a fractional amount of overhead but is critical to the next patch. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221118101714.19590-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221118101714.19590-2-mgorman@techsingularity.netSigned-off-by:
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reported-by:
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reviewed-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Peter Xu authored
This test was overlooked with a hard-coded mntpoint path in test when we're removing the hugetlb mntpoint in commit 0796c7b8. Fix it up so the test can keep running. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Y3aojfUC2nSwbCzB@x1n Fixes: 0796c7b8 ("selftests/vm: drop mnt point for hugetlb in run_vmtests.sh") Signed-off-by:
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reported-by:
Joel Savitz <jsavitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sergey Senozhatsky authored
We don't show num_reads and num_writes since we removed corresponding sysfs nodes in 2017. Block layer stats are exposed via /sys/block/zramX/stat file. However, we still increment those atomic vars and store them in zram stats. Remove leftovers. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221117141326.1105181-1-senozhatsky@chromium.orgSigned-off-by:
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Acked-by:
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Yang Li authored
mm/migrate.c:1198:24: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=3080 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116012345.84870-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by:
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
NODE_DATA() is preallocated for all possible nodes after commit 09f49dca ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracefully"). Checking its return value against NULL is now unnecessary. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116013808.3995280-2-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
hugetlb does not support fake write-faults (write faults without write permissions). However, we are currently able to trigger a FAULT_FLAG_WRITE fault on a VMA without VM_WRITE. If we'd ever want to support FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE, we'd have to teach hugetlb to: (1) Leave the page mapped R/O after the fake write-fault, like maybe_mkwrite() does. (2) Allow writing to an exclusive anon page that's mapped R/O when FOLL_FORCE is set, like can_follow_write_pte(). E.g., __follow_hugetlb_must_fault() needs adjustment. For now, it's not clear if that added complexity is really required. History tolds us that FOLL_FORCE is dangerous and that we better limit its use to a bare minimum. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <errno.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <linux/mman.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *map; int mem_fd; map = mmap(NULL, 2 * 1024 * 1024u, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_HUGETLB|MAP_HUGE_2MB, -1, 0); if (map == MAP_FAILED) { fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed: %d\n", errno); return 1; } mem_fd = open("/proc/self/mem", O_RDWR); if (mem_fd < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "open(/proc/self/mem) failed: %d\n", errno); return 1; } if (pwrite(mem_fd, "0", 1, (uintptr_t) map) == 1) { fprintf(stderr, "write() succeeded, which is unexpected\n"); return 1; } printf("write() failed as expected: %d\n", errno); return 0; } -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fortunately, we have a sanity check in hugetlb_wp() in place ever since commit 1d8d1464 ("mm/hugetlb: support write-faults in shared mappings"), that bails out instead of silently mapping a page writable in a !PROT_WRITE VMA. Consequently, above reproducer triggers a warning, similar to the one reported by szsbot: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3612 at mm/hugetlb.c:5313 hugetlb_wp+0x20a/0x1af0 mm/hugetlb.c:5313 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 3612 Comm: syz-executor250 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/11/2022 RIP: 0010:hugetlb_wp+0x20a/0x1af0 mm/hugetlb.c:5313 Code: ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 31 14 00 00 49 8b 5f 20 31 ff 48 89 dd 83 e5 02 48 89 ee e8 70 ab b7 ff 48 85 ed 75 5b e8 76 ae b7 ff <0f> 0b 41 bd 40 00 00 00 e8 69 ae b7 ff 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff RSP: 0018:ffffc90003caf620 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000008640070 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff88807b963a80 RSI: ffffffff81c4ed2a RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000008c07e R12: ffff888023805800 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff91217f38 R15: ffff88801d4b0360 FS: 0000555555bba300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fff7a47a1b8 CR3: 000000002378d000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> hugetlb_no_page mm/hugetlb.c:5755 [inline] hugetlb_fault+0x19cc/0x2060 mm/hugetlb.c:5874 follow_hugetlb_page+0x3f3/0x1850 mm/hugetlb.c:6301 __get_user_pages+0x2cb/0xf10 mm/gup.c:1202 __get_user_pages_locked mm/gup.c:1434 [inline] __get_user_pages_remote+0x18f/0x830 mm/gup.c:2187 get_user_pages_remote+0x84/0xc0 mm/gup.c:2260 __access_remote_vm+0x287/0x6b0 mm/memory.c:5517 ptrace_access_vm+0x181/0x1d0 kernel/ptrace.c:61 generic_ptrace_pokedata kernel/ptrace.c:1323 [inline] ptrace_request+0xb46/0x10c0 kernel/ptrace.c:1046 arch_ptrace+0x36/0x510 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c:828 __do_sys_ptrace kernel/ptrace.c:1296 [inline] __se_sys_ptrace kernel/ptrace.c:1269 [inline] __x64_sys_ptrace+0x178/0x2a0 kernel/ptrace.c:1269 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [...] So let's silence that warning by teaching GUP code that FOLL_FORCE -- so far -- does not apply to hugetlb. Note that FOLL_FORCE for read-access seems to be working as expected. The assumption is that this has been broken forever, only ever since above commit, we actually detect the wrong handling and WARN_ON_ONCE(). I assume this has been broken at least since 2014, when mm/gup.c came to life. I failed to come up with a suitable Fixes tag quickly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221031152524.173644-1-david@redhat.com Fixes: 1d8d1464 ("mm/hugetlb: support write-faults in shared mappings") Signed-off-by: -
David Hildenbrand authored
FOLL_FORCE is really only for ptrace access. As we unpin the pinned pages using unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(true), the assumption is that all these pages are writable. FOLL_FORCE in this case seems to be due to copy-and-past from other drivers. Let's just remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-20-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org> Cc: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
FOLL_FORCE is really only for ptrace access. As we unpin the pinned pages using unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(true), the assumption is that all these pages are writable. FOLL_FORCE in this case seems to be a legacy leftover. Let's just remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-19-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
FOLL_FORCE is really only for ptrace access. As we unpin the pinned pages using unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(true), the assumption is that all these pages are writable. FOLL_FORCE in this case seems to be a legacy leftover. Let's just remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-18-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com> Cc: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
FOLL_FORCE is really only for ptrace access. According to commit 70794724 ("media: videobuf2-vmalloc: get_userptr: buffers are always writable"), get_vaddr_frames() currently pins all pages writable as a workaround for issues with read-only buffers. FOLL_FORCE, however, seems to be a legacy leftover as it predates commit 70794724 ("media: videobuf2-vmalloc: get_userptr: buffers are always writable"). Let's just remove it. Once the read-only buffer issue has been resolved, FOLL_WRITE could again be set depending on the DMA direction. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-17-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> Acked-by:
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
FOLL_FORCE is really only for ptrace access. R/O pinning a page is supposed to fail if the VMA misses proper access permissions (no VM_READ). Let's just remove FOLL_FORCE usage here; there would have to be a pretty good reason to allow arbitrary drivers to R/O pin pages in a PROT_NONE VMA. Most probably, FOLL_FORCE usage is just some legacy leftover. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-16-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
GUP now supports reliable R/O long-term pinning in COW mappings, such that we break COW early. MAP_SHARED VMAs only use the shared zeropage so far in one corner case (DAXFS file with holes), which can be ignored because GUP does not support long-term pinning in fsdax (see check_vma_flags()). commit cd5297b0 ("drm/etnaviv: Use FOLL_FORCE for userptr") documents that FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE was really only used for reliable R/O pinning. Consequently, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM is no longer required for reliable R/O long-term pinning: FOLL_LONGTERM is sufficient. So stop using FOLL_FORCE, which is really only for ptrace access. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-15-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
GUP now supports reliable R/O long-term pinning in COW mappings, such that we break COW early. MAP_SHARED VMAs only use the shared zeropage so far in one corner case (DAXFS file with holes), which can be ignored because GUP does not support long-term pinning in fsdax (see check_vma_flags()). Consequently, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM is no longer required for reliable R/O long-term pinning: FOLL_LONGTERM is sufficient. So stop using FOLL_FORCE, which is really only for ptrace access. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-14-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
GUP now supports reliable R/O long-term pinning in COW mappings, such that we break COW early. MAP_SHARED VMAs only use the shared zeropage so far in one corner case (DAXFS file with holes), which can be ignored because GUP does not support long-term pinning in fsdax (see check_vma_flags()). Consequently, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM is no longer required for reliable R/O long-term pinning: FOLL_LONGTERM is sufficient. So stop using FOLL_FORCE, which is really only for ptrace access. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-13-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
GUP now supports reliable R/O long-term pinning in COW mappings, such that we break COW early. MAP_SHARED VMAs only use the shared zeropage so far in one corner case (DAXFS file with holes), which can be ignored because GUP does not support long-term pinning in fsdax (see check_vma_flags()). Consequently, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM is no longer required for reliable R/O long-term pinning: FOLL_LONGTERM is sufficient. So stop using FOLL_FORCE, which is really only for ptrace access. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-12-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
GUP now supports reliable R/O long-term pinning in COW mappings, such that we break COW early. MAP_SHARED VMAs only use the shared zeropage so far in one corner case (DAXFS file with holes), which can be ignored because GUP does not support long-term pinning in fsdax (see check_vma_flags()). Consequently, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM is no longer required for reliable R/O long-term pinning: FOLL_LONGTERM is sufficient. So stop using FOLL_FORCE, which is really only for ptrace access. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-11-david@redhat.com Tested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> [over mlx4 and mlx5] Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We already support reliable R/O pinning of anonymous memory. However, assume we end up pinning (R/O long-term) a pagecache page or the shared zeropage inside a writable private ("COW") mapping. The next write access will trigger a write-fault and replace the pinned page by an exclusive anonymous page in the process page tables to break COW: the pinned page no longer corresponds to the page mapped into the process' page table. Now that FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE can break COW on anything mapped into a COW mapping, let's properly break COW first before R/O long-term pinning something that's not an exclusive anon page inside a COW mapping. FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE will break COW and map an exclusive anon page instead that can get pinned safely. With this change, we can stop using FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE for reliable R/O long-term pinning in COW mappings. With this change, the new R/O long-term pinning tests for non-anonymous memory succeed: # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with shared zeropage ok 151 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with memfd ok 152 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with tmpfile ok 153 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with huge zeropage ok 154 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with memfd hugetlb (2048 kB) ok 155 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with memfd hugetlb (1048576 kB) ok 156 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with shared zeropage ok 157 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with memfd ok 158 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with tmpfile ok 159 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with huge zeropage ok 160 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with memfd hugetlb (2048 kB) ok 161 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with memfd hugetlb (1048576 kB) ok 162 Longterm R/O pin is reliable Note 1: We don't care about short-term R/O-pinning, because they have snapshot semantics: they are not supposed to observe modifications that happen after pinning. As one example, assume we start direct I/O to read from a page and store page content into a file: modifications to page content after starting direct I/O are not guaranteed to end up in the file. So even if we'd pin the shared zeropage, the end result would be as expected -- getting zeroes stored to the file. Note 2: For shared mappings we'll now always fallback to the slow path to lookup the VMA when R/O long-term pining. While that's the necessary price we have to pay right now, it's actually not that bad in practice: most FOLL_LONGTERM users already specify FOLL_WRITE, for example, along with FOLL_FORCE because they tried dealing with COW mappings correctly ... Note 3: For users that use FOLL_LONGTERM right now without FOLL_WRITE, such as VFIO, we'd now no longer pin the shared zeropage. Instead, we'd populate exclusive anon pages that we can pin. There was a concern that this could affect the memlock limit of existing setups. For example, a VM running with VFIO could run into the memlock limit and fail to run. However, we essentially had the same behavior already in commit 17839856 ("gup: document and work around "COW can break either way" issue") which got merged into some enterprise distros, and there were not any such complaints. So most probably, we're fine. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-10-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Extend FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE to break COW on anything mapped into a COW (i.e., private writable) mapping and adjust the documentation accordingly. FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE will now also break COW when encountering the shared zeropage, a pagecache page, a PFNMAP, ... inside a COW mapping, by properly replacing the mapped page/pfn by a private copy (an exclusive anonymous page). Note that only do_wp_page() needs care: hugetlb_wp() already handles FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE correctly. wp_huge_pmd()/wp_huge_pud() also handles it correctly, for example, splitting the huge zeropage on FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE such that we can handle FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE on the PTE level. This change is a requirement for reliable long-term R/O pinning in COW mappings. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-9-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
If we already have a PMD/PUD mapped write-protected in a private mapping and we want to break COW either due to FAULT_FLAG_WRITE or FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE, there is no need to inform the file system just like on the PTE path. Let's just split (->zap) + fallback in that case. This is a preparation for more generic FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE support in COW mappings. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-8-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We want to extent FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE support to anything mapped into a COW mapping (pagecache page, zeropage, PFN, ...), not just anonymous pages. Let's prepare for that by handling shared mappings first such that we can handle private mappings last. While at it, use folio-based functions instead of page-based functions where we touch the code either way. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-7-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's catch abuse of FAULT_FLAG_WRITE early, such that we don't have to care in all other handlers and might get "surprises" if we forget to do so. Write faults without VM_MAYWRITE don't make any sense, and our maybe_mkwrite() logic could have hidden such abuse for now. Write faults without VM_WRITE on something that is not a COW mapping is similarly broken, and e.g., do_wp_page() could end up placing an anonymous page into a shared mapping, which would be bad. This is a preparation for reliable R/O long-term pinning of pages in private mappings, whereby we want to make sure that we will never break COW in a read-only private mapping. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-6-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
For now, FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE only applies to anonymous pages, which implies a COW mapping. Let's hide FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE early if we're not dealing with a COW mapping, such that we treat it like a read fault as documented and don't have to worry about the flag throughout all fault handlers. While at it, centralize the check for mutual exclusion of FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE and FAULT_FLAG_WRITE and just drop the check that either flag is set in the WP handler. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-5-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's test whether R/O long-term pinning is reliable for non-anonymous memory: when R/O long-term pinning a page, the expectation is that we break COW early before pinning, such that actual write access via the page tables won't break COW later and end up replacing the R/O-pinned page in the page table. Consequently, R/O long-term pinning in private mappings would only target exclusive anonymous pages. For now, all tests fail: # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with shared zeropage not ok 151 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with memfd not ok 152 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with tmpfile not ok 153 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with huge zeropage not ok 154 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with memfd hugetlb (2048 kB) not ok 155 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP pin ... with memfd hugetlb (1048576 kB) not ok 156 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with shared zeropage not ok 157 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with memfd not ok 158 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with tmpfile not ok 159 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with huge zeropage not ok 160 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with memfd hugetlb (2048 kB) not ok 161 Longterm R/O pin is reliable # [RUN] R/O longterm GUP-fast pin ... with memfd hugetlb (1048576 kB) not ok 162 Longterm R/O pin is reliable Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-4-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's add basic tests for COW with non-anonymous pages in private mappings: write access should properly trigger COW and result in the private changes not being visible through other page mappings. Especially, add tests for: * Zeropage * Huge zeropage * Ordinary pagecache pages via memfd and tmpfile() * Hugetlb pages via memfd Fortunately, all tests pass. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Patch series "mm/gup: remove FOLL_FORCE usage from drivers (reliable R/O long-term pinning)". For now, we did not support reliable R/O long-term pinning in COW mappings. That means, if we would trigger R/O long-term pinning in MAP_PRIVATE mapping, we could end up pinning the (R/O-mapped) shared zeropage or a pagecache page. The next write access would trigger a write fault and replace the pinned page by an exclusive anonymous page in the process page table; whatever the process would write to that private page copy would not be visible by the owner of the previous page pin: for example, RDMA could read stale data. The end result is essentially an unexpected and hard-to-debug memory corruption. Some drivers tried working around that limitation by using "FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE|FOLL_LONGTERM" for R/O long-term pinning for now. FOLL_WRITE would trigger a write fault, if required, and break COW before pinning the page. FOLL_FORCE is required because the VMA might lack write permissions, and drivers wanted to make that working as well, just like one would expect (no write access, but still triggering a write access to break COW). However, that is not a practical solution, because (1) Drivers that don't stick to that undocumented and debatable pattern would still run into that issue. For example, VFIO only uses FOLL_LONGTERM for R/O long-term pinning. (2) Using FOLL_WRITE just to work around a COW mapping + page pinning limitation is unintuitive. FOLL_WRITE would, for example, mark the page softdirty or trigger uffd-wp, even though, there actually isn't going to be any write access. (3) The purpose of FOLL_FORCE is debug access, not access without lack of VMA permissions by arbitrarty drivers. So instead, make R/O long-term pinning work as expected, by breaking COW in a COW mapping early, such that we can remove any FOLL_FORCE usage from drivers and make FOLL_FORCE ptrace-specific (renaming it to FOLL_PTRACE). More details in patch #8. This patch (of 19): Originally, the plan was to have a separate tests for testing COW of non-anonymous (e.g., shared zeropage) pages. Turns out, that we'd need a lot of similar functionality and that there isn't a really good reason to separate it. So let's prepare for non-anon tests by renaming to "cow". Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116102659.70287-2-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: -
Lukas Bulwahn authored
Commit 6a108a14 ("kconfig: rename CONFIG_EMBEDDED to CONFIG_EXPERT") introduces CONFIG_EXPERT to carry the previous intent of CONFIG_EMBEDDED and just gives that intent a much better name. That has been clearly a good and long overdue renaming, and it is clearly an improvement to the kernel build configuration that has shown to help managing the kernel build configuration in the last decade. However, rather than bravely and radically just deleting CONFIG_EMBEDDED, this commit gives CONFIG_EMBEDDED a new intended semantics, but keeps it open for future contributors to implement that intended semantics: A new CONFIG_EMBEDDED option is added that automatically selects CONFIG_EXPERT when enabled and can be used in the future to isolate options that should only be considered for embedded systems (RISC architectures, SLOB, etc). Since then, this CONFIG_EMBEDDED implicitly had two purposes: - It can make even more options visible beyond what CONFIG_EXPERT makes visible. In other words, it may introduce another level of enabling the visibility of configuration options: always visible, visible with CONFIG_EXPERT and visible with CONFIG_EMBEDDED. - Set certain default values of some configurations differently, following the assumption that configuring a kernel build for an embedded system generally starts with a different set of default values compared to kernel builds for all other kind of systems. Considering the second purpose, note that already probably arguing that a kernel build for an embedded system would choose some values differently is already tricky: the set of embedded systems with Linux kernels is already quite diverse. Many embedded system have powerful CPUs and it would not be clear that all embedded systems just optimize towards one specific aspect, e.g., a smaller kernel image size. So, it is unclear if starting with "one set of default configuration" that is induced by CONFIG_EMBEDDED is a good offer for developers configuring their kernels. Also, the differences of needed user-space features in an embedded system compared to a non-embedded system are probably difficult or even impossible to name in some generic way. So it is not surprising that in the last decade hardly anyone has contributed changes to make something default differently in case of CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y. Currently, in v6.0-rc4, SECRETMEM is the only config switched off if CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y. As long as that is actually the only option that currently is selected or deselected, it is better to just make SECRETMEM configurable at build time by experts using menuconfig instead. Make SECRETMEM configurable when EXPERT is set and otherwise default to yes. Further, SECRETMEM needs ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP. This allows us to remove CONFIG_EMBEDDED in the close future. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221116131922.25533-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by:
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jason Gunthorpe authored
This restriction was created because FOLL_LONGTERM used to scan the vma list, so it could not tolerate becoming unlocked. That was fixed in commit 52650c8b ("mm/gup: remove the vma allocation from gup_longterm_locked()") and the restriction on !vma was removed. However, the locked restriction remained, even though it isn't necessary anymore. Adjust __gup_longterm_locked() so it can handle the mmap_read_lock() becoming unlocked while it is looping for migration. Migration does not require the mmap_read_sem because it is only handling struct pages. If we had to unlock then ensure the whole thing returns unlocked. Remove __get_user_pages_remote() and __gup_longterm_unlocked(). These cases can now just directly call other functions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0-v1-b9ae39aa8884+14dbb-gup_longterm_locked_jgg@nvidia.comSigned-off-by:
-
Rong Tao authored
When testing overflow and overread, there is no need to keep unnecessary compilation warnings, we should simply ignore them. The motivation for this patch is to eliminate the compilation warning, maybe one day we will compile the kernel with "-Werror -Wall", at which point this compilation warning will turn into a compilation error, we should fix this error in advance. How to reproduce the problem (with gcc-11.3.1): $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/ ... warning: `write' reading 4294967295 bytes from a region of size 1 [-Wstringop-overread] warning: `read' writing 4294967295 bytes into a region of size 25 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=] "-Wno-stringop-overread" is supported at least in gcc-11.1.0. Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=d14c547abd484d3540b692bb8048c4a6efe92c8b Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/tencent_51C4ACA8CB3895C2D7F35178440283602107@qq.comSigned-off-by:Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn> Reviewed-by:
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Li zeming authored
The ei pointer does not need to cast the type. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221107015659.3221-1-zeming@nfschina.comSigned-off-by:
Li zeming <zeming@nfschina.com> Reviewed-by:
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
Currently, drop_caches are reclaiming node-by-node, looping on each node until reclaim could not make progress. This can however leave quite some slab entries (such as filesystem inodes) unreclaimed if objects say on node 1 keep objects on node 0 pinned. So move the "loop until no progress" loop to the node-by-node iteration to retry reclaim also on other nodes if reclaim on some nodes made progress. This fixes problem when drop_caches was not reclaiming lots of otherwise perfectly fine to reclaim inodes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221115123255.12559-1-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by:
You Zhou <you.zhou@intel.com> Reported-by:
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> Tested-by:
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Pasha Tatashin authored
Since commit 9a10064f ("mm: add a field to store names for private anonymous memory"), name for private anonymous memory, but not shared anonymous, can be set. However, naming shared anonymous memory just as useful for tracking purposes. Extend the functionality to be able to set names for shared anon. There are two ways to create anonymous shared memory, using memfd or directly via mmap(): 1. fd = memfd_create(...) mem = mmap(..., MAP_SHARED, fd, ...) 2. mem = mmap(..., MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, ...) In both cases the anonymous shared memory is created the same way by mapping an unlinked file on tmpfs. The memfd way allows to give a name for anonymous shared memory, but not useful when parts of shared memory require to have distinct names. Example use case: The VMM maps VM memory as anonymous shared memory (not private because VMM is sandboxed and drivers are running in their own processes). However, the VM tells back to the VMM how parts of the memory are actually used by the guest, how each of the segments should be backed (i.e. 4K pages, 2M pages), and some other information about the segments. The naming allows us to monitor the effective memory footprint for each of these segments from the host without looking inside the guest. Sample output: /* Create shared anonymous segmenet */ anon_shmem = mmap(NULL, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); /* Name the segment: "MY-NAME" */ rv = prctl(PR_SET_VMA, PR_SET_VMA_ANON_NAME, anon_shmem, SIZE, "MY-NAME"); cat /proc/<pid>/maps (and smaps): 7fc8e2b4c000-7fc8f2b4c000 rw-s 00000000 00:01 1024 [anon_shmem:MY-NAME] If the segment is not named, the output is: 7fc8e2b4c000-7fc8f2b4c000 rw-s 00000000 00:01 1024 /dev/zero (deleted) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221115020602.804224-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.comSigned-off-by:
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Acked-by:
-
T.J. Mercier authored
The shrinker.h header depends on a user including other headers before it for types used by shrinker.h. Fix this by including the appropriate headers in shrinker.h. ./include/linux/shrinker.h:13:9: error: unknown type name `gfp_t' 13 | gfp_t gfp_mask; | ^~~~~ ./include/linux/shrinker.h:71:26: error: field `list' has incomplete type 71 | struct list_head list; | ^~~~ ./include/linux/shrinker.h:82:9: error: unknown type name `atomic_long_t' 82 | atomic_long_t *nr_deferred; | Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221114235949.201749-1-tjmercier@google.com Fixes: 83aeeada ("vmscan: use atomic-long for shrinker batching") Fixes: b0d40c92 ("superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure") Signed-off-by:T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
The common hugetlb unmap routine __unmap_hugepage_range performs mmu notification calls. However, in the case where __unmap_hugepage_range is called via __unmap_hugepage_range_final, mmu notification calls are performed earlier in other calling routines. Remove mmu notification calls from __unmap_hugepage_range. Add notification calls to the only other caller: unmap_hugepage_range. unmap_hugepage_range is called for truncation and hole punch, so change notification type from UNMAP to CLEAR as this is more appropriate. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221114235507.294320-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Suggested-by:
-
Peter Xu authored
Let's add one sanity check for CONFIG_DEBUG_VM on the write bit in whatever chance we have when walking through the pgtables. It can bring the error earlier even before the app notices the data was corrupted on the snapshot. Also it helps us to identify this is a wrong pgtable setup, so hopefully a great information to have for debugging too. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221114000447.1681003-3-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yixuan Cao authored
I noticed a typo in a code comment and I fixed it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221114171426.91745-1-caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cnSigned-off-by:
Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn> Signed-off-by:
-
Jian Wen authored
MADV_FREE pages have been moved into the LRU_INACTIVE_FILE list by commit f7ad2a6c ("mm: move MADV_FREE pages into LRU_INACTIVE_FILE list"). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221111034639.3593380-1-wenjian1@xiaomi.comSigned-off-by:
Jian Wen <wenjian1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaoqian Lin authored
alloc_memory_type() returns error pointers on error instead of NULL. Use IS_ERR() to check the return value to fix this. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221110030751.1627266-1-linmq006@gmail.com Fixes: 7b88bda3 ("mm/demotion/dax/kmem: set node's abstract distance to MEMTIER_DEFAULT_DAX_ADISTANCE") Signed-off-by:
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Huang Ying authored
Quite straightforward, the page functions are converted to corresponding folio functions. Same for comments. THP specific code are converted to be large folio. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221109012348.93849-3-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by:
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Tested-by:
-
Huang Ying authored
Patch series "migrate: convert migrate_pages()/unmap_and_move() to use folios", v2. The conversion is quite straightforward, just replace the page API to the corresponding folio API. migrate_pages() and unmap_and_move() mostly work with folios (head pages) only. This patch (of 2): Quite straightforward, the page functions are converted to corresponding folio functions. Same for comments. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221109012348.93849-1-ying.huang@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221109012348.93849-2-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by:
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by:
-
Baolin Wang authored
Revert commit 83156821 ("mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page"), since after commit 1a6baaa0 ("s390/hugetlb: switch to generic version of follow_huge_pud()") and commit 57a196a5 ("hugetlb: simplify hugetlb handling in follow_page_mask") were merged, now all the following huge page routines can support FOLL_GET operation. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/496786039852aba90ffa68f10d0df3f4236a990b.1667983080.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by:
Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
-
