- 13 Jul, 2023 26 commits
-
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Reviewed-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Message-Id: <20230705190309.579783-39-jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Acked-by:
Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Acked-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Acked-by:
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Acked-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Acked-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Acked-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Reviewed-by:
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 10 Jul, 2023 14 commits
-
-
Jeff Layton authored
In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of inode->i_ctime. Acked-by:
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Reviewed-by:
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Message-Id: <20230705190309.579783-13-jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Convert to the new simple_rename_timestamp helper function. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Convert to the new simple_rename_timestamp helper function. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Convert to the new simple_rename_timestamp helper function. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Convert to the new simple_rename_timestamp helper function. Signed-off-by:
Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Message-Id: <20230705190309.579783-8-jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Convert to the new simple_rename_timestamp helper function. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Add a function that handles the details sanely, and convert the libfs.c callers to use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
struct timespec64 has unused bits in the tv_nsec field that can be used for other purposes. In future patches, we're going to change how the inode->i_ctime is accessed in certain inodes in order to make use of them. In order to do that safely though, we'll need to eradicate raw accesses of the inode->i_ctime field from the kernel. Add new accessor functions for the ctime that we use to replace them. Reviewed-by:
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Message-Id: <20230705185812.579118-2-jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
POSIX says: "Upon successful completion, where nbyte is greater than 0, write() shall mark for update the last data modification and last file status change timestamps of the file..." Add the missing ctime update. Signed-off-by:Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Message-Id: <20230705190309.579783-6-jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
In general, when updating the mtime on an inode, one must also update the ctime. Add the missing ctime updates. Acked-by:
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
When removing entries from a directory, the ctime must also be updated alongside the mtime. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
POSIX says: "Upon successful completion, where nbyte is greater than 0, write() shall mark for update the last data modification and last file status change timestamps of the file..." Add the missing ctime update. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Layton authored
When adding entries to a directory, POSIX generally requires that the ctime be updated alongside the mtime. Signed-off-by:
-
