1. 10 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  2. 07 Jul, 2015 1 commit
    • Brian Foster's avatar
      xfs: don't truncate attribute extents if no extents exist · 5bbed227
      Brian Foster authored
      commit f66bf042 upstream.
      
      The xfs_attr3_root_inactive() call from xfs_attr_inactive() assumes that
      attribute blocks exist to invalidate. It is possible to have an
      attribute fork without extents, however. Consider the case where the
      attribute fork is created towards the beginning of xfs_attr_set() but
      some part of the subsequent attribute set fails.
      
      If an inode in such a state hits xfs_attr_inactive(), it eventually
      calls xfs_dabuf_map() and possibly xfs_bmapi_read(). The former emits a
      filesystem corruption warning, returns an error that bubbles back up to
      xfs_attr_inactive(), and leads to destruction of the in-core attribute
      fork without an on-disk reset. If the inode happens to make it back
      through xfs_inactive() in this state (e.g., via a concurrent bulkstat
      that cycles the inode from the reclaim state and releases it), i_afp
      might not exist when xfs_bmapi_read() is called and causes a NULL
      dereference panic.
      
      A '-p 2' fsstress run to ENOSPC on a relatively small fs (1GB)
      reproduces these problems. The behavior is a regression caused by:
      
      6dfe5a04 xfs: xfs_attr_inactive leaves inconsistent attr fork state behind
      
      ... which removed logic that avoided the attribute extent truncate when
      no extents exist. Restore this logic to ensure the attribute fork is
      destroyed and reset correctly if it exists without any allocated
      extents.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarKamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
      5bbed227
  3. 06 Jul, 2015 38 commits