1. 14 Mar, 2024 1 commit
  2. 15 Jan, 2024 1 commit
  3. 23 Oct, 2023 1 commit
  4. 28 Jun, 2023 1 commit
  5. 24 Jun, 2023 1 commit
  6. 31 May, 2023 1 commit
  7. 17 May, 2023 1 commit
  8. 02 May, 2023 2 commits
  9. 16 Feb, 2023 1 commit
  10. 20 Dec, 2022 1 commit
  11. 19 Dec, 2022 1 commit
  12. 12 Dec, 2022 2 commits
  13. 19 Sep, 2022 1 commit
    • Klaus Wölfel's avatar
      erp5_configurator_standard_solver: Add missing solver_workflow to Quantity Split Move Solver · cc60aa8f
      Klaus Wölfel authored
      The missing workflow resulted in a bug when moving quantities multiple times, first to one delivery, then to another delivery. Then the same solver process with same decision was used as for the first time even if the first delivery was already delivered or movement was deleted. The reason was that Quantity Split Move Solver did not change to succeeded state after solving, so Solver Process did not change to solved state.
      cc60aa8f
  14. 18 Sep, 2022 1 commit
  15. 14 Sep, 2022 2 commits
  16. 15 Jun, 2022 2 commits
  17. 14 Jun, 2022 4 commits
  18. 13 Jun, 2022 4 commits
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      trade: Consider movement dates to select trade condition for price · 7193b12d
      Jérome Perrin authored
      using movement date rather than order date is more correct
      7193b12d
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      composition: only consider validated when looking up effective models · 5d929056
      Jérome Perrin authored
      composition API, which is used to select the "most applicable" model
      (Trade Condition, Transformation, Pay Sheet Model, etc) with the same
      reference was only discarding deleted and validated models, but it
      was selecting draft models.
      
      This leads to this kind of problem:
       - A validated model exist, with an effective date
       - A new model is made by cloning the validated one, edited to set
        effective date from now and validated
       - The first validated model is also cloned by mistake, but not
        validated
      In such case, the model cloned by mistake might be used, which from
      user point of view is wrong, because user validated a model, so if
      the system use a draft instead, that's a very wrong behaviour.
      
      This change require models to be validated for the composition API to
      work, many tests were updated to validate the model (either in the test
      or in the data business template used by the test).
      
      This change might also produce different results in production, because
      it was possible that some draft models were selected before, now they
      will no longer be selected. To check for potential side effects, we
      recommend looking for all draft models with a reference, examine them
      one by one and validate the model if it's a case where user forgot to
      validate.
      5d929056
    • Vincent Pelletier's avatar
      Products.CMFActivity: Unconditionally change user in dummyGroupMethod · 0e57df28
      Vincent Pelletier authored
      Since
        commit f363ac65
        Author: Vincent Pelletier <vincent@nexedi.com>
        Date:   Wed Mar 23 15:55:46 2022 +0900
      
            Products.CMFActivity.ActivityTool: Store user object in activity.
      user_name on newly created activities is always None. As a result,
      activities using dummyGroupMethod are executed within the security
      context which spawns the group, which is System Processes, instead of
      the user which spawned each activity.
      Add a unittest for this.
      0e57df28
    • Vincent Pelletier's avatar
      Products.CMFActivity: Fix user name in activity tracking log messages · 984f7f13
      Vincent Pelletier authored
      This was broken by:
        commit f363ac65
        Author: Vincent Pelletier <vincent@nexedi.com>
        Date:   Wed Mar 23 15:55:46 2022 +0900
      
            Products.CMFActivity.ActivityTool: Store user object in activity.
      as user_name becomes always None.
      984f7f13
  19. 09 Jun, 2022 6 commits
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Enable coding style on erp5_payroll · 34d50a78
      Jérome Perrin authored
      See merge request nexedi/erp5!1637
      34d50a78
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      core: repair ERP5Site_reindexLatestIndexedObjects · e83e7960
      Jérome Perrin authored
      This script stopped working since Catalog changed to be ERP5 document,
      because it was calling the unindex method of the catalog (which
      itself is indexable like any other ERP5 document). Update to use the
      uncatalogObject which is the method to unindex a document by uid.
      
      Even though it was somehow working before, it was not really correct
      in selecting objects, because it was using - operator on TIMESTAMP
      column, which is not computing a difference in seconds as this script
      was expecting. See for example https://stackoverflow.com/a/24504132/7607763
      or the example below for an explanation. Instead, use TIMESTAMPADD
      to compute the start timestamp only once and use >= operator, which
      works as expected.
      
      This query was also sorting by indexation_timestamp, which does not
      use an index. Remove the sort because it's not really needed.
      
      Excluding reserved path was also not needed, we no longer use these
      since 69aefdff (ZSQLCatalog: Drop support for "reserved" path.,
      2017-09-18)
      
      ---
      
      Another reproduction of the timestamp arithmetic problem
      
      select
         TIMESTAMP('2021-01-02 00:00:00') - TIMESTAMP('2021-01-01 00:00:00') a,
         20210102000000 - 20210101000000 aa,
         TIMESTAMP('2021-06-01 00:00:00') - TIMESTAMP('2021-05-31 00:00:00') b,
         20210601000000 - 20210531000000 bb,
         TIMESTAMPDIFF(second, TIMESTAMP('2021-05-31 00:00:00'), TIMESTAMP('2021-06-01 00:00:00')) c
      
      | a | aa | b | bb | c |
      | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ |
      | 1000000 | 1000000 | 70000000 | 70000000 | 86400 |
      e83e7960
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      9a518828
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      tests/SecurityTestCase: sort groups in assertion failure message · f1e4e1c3
      Jérome Perrin authored
      This is a bit easier to read
      f1e4e1c3
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      74157942
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Zelenium: catch potential errors when making (HTML) link for failed test · bb7edb27
      Jérome Perrin authored
      When a test fail, we make a data-url link with the HTML of the current
      page, so that we can easily investigate test failures n test nodes.
      We should not let errors that might happen here propagate, otherwise
      the test result is not created and the test runner does not detect
      that the test is finished.
      
      One case that caused such errors was failed assertion just after
      using goBack command without waiting
      bb7edb27
  20. 08 Jun, 2022 2 commits
  21. 06 Jun, 2022 4 commits