Ignore NLM_F_MULTI.

I don't understand why, but it fixes the problems we have, and Gregoire
says it's okay.

kernel_netlink.c

@@ -224,8 +224,6 @@ netlink_read(struct netlink *nl, struct netlink *nl_ignore, int answer,
             NLMSG_OK(nh, len);
             nh = NLMSG_NEXT(nh, len)) {
             debugf("%s", (nh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_MULTI) ? "[multi] " : "");
-            if(!(nh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_MULTI))
-                done = 1;
             if(nl_ignore && nh->nlmsg_pid == nl_ignore->sockaddr.nl_pid) {
                 debugf("(ignore), ");
                 continue;
@@ -243,8 +241,6 @@ netlink_read(struct netlink *nl, struct netlink *nl_ignore, int answer,
                 struct nlmsgerr *err = (struct nlmsgerr *)NLMSG_DATA(nh);
                 if(err->error == 0) {
                     debugf("(ACK)\n");
-                    if(!(nh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_MULTI) && !fn)
-                        return 0;
                 } else {
                     errno = -err->error;
                     perror("netlink_read");