Commit fc7385d6 authored by Evan Read's avatar Evan Read

Merge branch 'msj-ruby-gotchas' into 'master'

TW review of Ruby gotchas doc

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!72858
parents 0c843d27 8253a45c
......@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ autoscales
autoscaling
awardable
awardables
Ayoa
Axios
Ayoa
Azure
B-tree
backfilling
......@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ canonicalized
captcha
CentOS
Certbot
chai
changeset
changesets
chai
ChaosKube
chatbot
chatbots
......@@ -683,8 +683,8 @@ triaged
triages
triaging
Trivy
truthy
Truststore
truthy
Twilio
Twitter
TypeScript
......
......@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ This section documents several problems we found while working on [Ruby 3 suppor
and which led to subtle bugs or test failures that were difficult to understand. We encourage every GitLab contributor
who writes Ruby code on a regular basis to familiarize themselves with these issues.
The complete list of changes to the Ruby 3 language and standard library is found [here](https://rubyreferences.github.io/rubychanges/3.0.html).
To find the complete list of changes to the Ruby 3 language and standard library, see
[Ruby Changes](https://rubyreferences.github.io/rubychanges/3.0.html).
## `Hash#each` consistently yields a 2-element array to lambdas
......@@ -56,23 +57,23 @@ To write code that works under both 2.7 and 3.0, consider the following options:
We recommend always passing the block explicitly, and prefer two required arguments as block parameters.
More information can be found in [Ruby issue 12706](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12706).
To learn more, see [Ruby issue 12706](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12706).
## `Symbol#to_proc` returns signature metadata consistent with lambdas
A common idiom in Ruby is to obtain procs via the `&:<symbol>` shorthand and
A common idiom in Ruby is to obtain `Proc` objects using the `&:<symbol>` shorthand and
pass them to higher-order functions:
```ruby
[1, 2, 3].each(&:to_s)
```
Ruby desugars `&:<symbol>` to `Symbol#to_proc`, which we can `call` with
the method _receiver_ as its first argument (here `Integer`), and all method _arguments_
(here none) as its remaining arguments.
Ruby desugars `&:<symbol>` to `Symbol#to_proc`. We can call it with
the method _receiver_ as its first argument (here: `Integer`), and all method _arguments_
(here: none) as its remaining arguments.
This behaves the same in both Ruby 2.7 and Ruby 3; where Ruby 3 diverges is when capturing
this proc and inspecting its call signature.
This behaves the same in both Ruby 2.7 and Ruby 3. Where Ruby 3 diverges is when capturing
this `Proc` object and inspecting its call signature.
This is often done when writing DSLs or using other forms of meta-programming:
```ruby
......@@ -83,15 +84,15 @@ p = :foo.to_proc # This usually happens via a conversion through `&:foo`
puts "#{p.parameters} (#{p.arity})"
```
Ruby 2.7 reports zero required and one optional parameter for this proc, while Ruby 3 reports one required
and one optional parameter. As described above, Ruby 2.7 is incorrect: the first argument must
always be passed, as it is the receiver of the method the proc represents, and methods cannot be
Ruby 2.7 reports zero required and one optional parameter for this `Proc` object, while Ruby 3 reports one required
and one optional parameter. Ruby 2.7 is incorrect: the first argument must
always be passed, as it is the receiver of the method the `Proc` object represents, and methods cannot be
called without a receiver.
Ruby 3 corrects this, meaning code that tests proc arity or parameter lists might now break and
Ruby 3 corrects this: the code that tests `Proc` object arity or parameter lists might now break and
has to be updated.
More information can be found in [Ruby issue 16260](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16260).
To learn more, see [Ruby issue 16260](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16260).
## `OpenStruct` does not evaluate fields lazily
......@@ -101,14 +102,15 @@ In Ruby 3.0, it defines these methods eagerly in the initializer, which can brea
and override these methods.
Don't inherit from `OpenStruct` for these reasons; ideally, don't use it at all.
`OpenStruct` is [considered problematic](https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.2/libdoc/ostruct/rdoc/OpenStruct.html#class-OpenStruct-label-Caveats) for various reasons. When writing new code, prefer a `Struct` instead, which is simpler in implementation, although less flexible.
`OpenStruct` is [considered problematic](https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.2/libdoc/ostruct/rdoc/OpenStruct.html#class-OpenStruct-label-Caveats).
When writing new code, prefer a `Struct` instead, which is simpler in implementation, although less flexible.
## `Regexp` and `Range` instances are frozen
It is not necessary anymore to explicitly `freeze` `Regexp` or `Range` instances, since Ruby 3 freezes
It is not necessary anymore to explicitly freeze `Regexp` or `Range` instances because Ruby 3 freezes
them automatically upon creation.
This has a subtle side-effect: Tests that stub method calls on these types now fail with an error, since
This has a subtle side-effect: Tests that stub method calls on these types now fail with an error because
RSpec cannot stub frozen objects:
```ruby
......@@ -129,11 +131,10 @@ allow(subject).to receive(:function_returning_range).and_return(1..42)
Ruby 3.0.2 has a known bug that causes [table tests](testing_guide/best_practices.md#table-based--parameterized-tests)
to fail when table values consist of integer values.
The reasons are documented in [issue 337614](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/337614).
This problem has been fixed in Ruby and the fix is expected to be included in Ruby 3.0.3, which is not yet
available at this time.
This problem has been fixed in Ruby and the fix is expected to be included in Ruby 3.0.3.
The problem only affects users who run an unpatched Ruby 3.0.2. This is likely the case when you
installed Ruby manually or via tools like `asdf`. Users of the `gitlab-development-kit (GDK)`
are also affected by this problem.
Build images are not affected, since they include the patch set addressing this bug.
Build images are not affected because they include the patch set addressing this bug.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment