-
Chris Wilson authored
Since we use i915_gem_find_active_request() from inside intel_engine_dump() and may call that at any time, we do not guarantee that the engine is paused nor that the signal kthreads and irq handler are suspended, so we cannot assert that the breadcrumb doesn't advance and that the irq hasn't happened on another CPU signaling the request we believe to be idle. The second assert removed (that request->engine == engine) remains valid, but is now more rigorously checked during retirement. Fixes: f636edb2 ("drm/i915: Make i915_engine_info pretty printer to standalone") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180529132922.6831-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit cc7cc534) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
bc61ec46