Commit 14e153ef authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Thomas Gleixner

x86, fpu: Introduce per-cpu in_kernel_fpu state

interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() tries to detect if kernel_fpu_begin()
is safe or not. In particular it should obviously deny the nested
kernel_fpu_begin() and this logic looks very confusing.

If use_eager_fpu() == T we rely on a) __thread_has_fpu() check in
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(), and b) on the fact that _begin() does
__thread_clear_has_fpu().

Otherwise we demand that the interrupted task has no FPU if it is in
kernel mode, this works because __kernel_fpu_begin() does clts() and
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() checks X86_CR0_TS.

Add the per-cpu "bool in_kernel_fpu" variable, and change this code
to check/set/clear it. This allows to do more cleanups and fixes, see
the next changes.

The patch also moves WARN_ON_ONCE() under preempt_disable() just to
make this_cpu_read() look better, this is not really needed. And in
fact I think we should move it into __kernel_fpu_begin().
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com
Cc: bp@suse.de
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: luto@amacapital.net
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115191943.GB27332@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent 6ca7a8a1
...@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ extern void __kernel_fpu_end(void); ...@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ extern void __kernel_fpu_end(void);
static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void) static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
{ {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable());
preempt_disable(); preempt_disable();
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable());
__kernel_fpu_begin(); __kernel_fpu_begin();
} }
......
...@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ ...@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
#include <asm/fpu-internal.h> #include <asm/fpu-internal.h>
#include <asm/user.h> #include <asm/user.h>
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, in_kernel_fpu);
/* /*
* Were we in an interrupt that interrupted kernel mode? * Were we in an interrupt that interrupted kernel mode?
* *
...@@ -33,6 +35,9 @@ ...@@ -33,6 +35,9 @@
*/ */
static inline bool interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(void) static inline bool interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(void)
{ {
if (this_cpu_read(in_kernel_fpu))
return false;
if (use_eager_fpu()) if (use_eager_fpu())
return __thread_has_fpu(current); return __thread_has_fpu(current);
...@@ -73,6 +78,8 @@ void __kernel_fpu_begin(void) ...@@ -73,6 +78,8 @@ void __kernel_fpu_begin(void)
{ {
struct task_struct *me = current; struct task_struct *me = current;
this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, true);
if (__thread_has_fpu(me)) { if (__thread_has_fpu(me)) {
__thread_clear_has_fpu(me); __thread_clear_has_fpu(me);
__save_init_fpu(me); __save_init_fpu(me);
...@@ -99,6 +106,8 @@ void __kernel_fpu_end(void) ...@@ -99,6 +106,8 @@ void __kernel_fpu_end(void)
} else { } else {
stts(); stts();
} }
this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, false);
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kernel_fpu_end); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kernel_fpu_end);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment