perf/x86/intel: Correct local vs remote sibling state
For some obscure reason the current code accounts the current SMT thread's state on the remote thread and reads the remote's state on the local SMT thread. While internally consistent, and 'correct' its pointless confusion we can do without. Flip them the right way around. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment