Commit 243198d0 authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro Committed by David S. Miller

rps_dev_flow_table_release(): no need to delay vfree()

The same story as with fib_trie patch - vfree() from RCU callbacks
is legitimate now.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 00203563
......@@ -593,7 +593,6 @@ struct rps_dev_flow {
struct rps_dev_flow_table {
unsigned int mask;
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct work_struct free_work;
struct rps_dev_flow flows[0];
};
#define RPS_DEV_FLOW_TABLE_SIZE(_num) (sizeof(struct rps_dev_flow_table) + \
......
......@@ -606,21 +606,11 @@ static ssize_t show_rps_dev_flow_table_cnt(struct netdev_rx_queue *queue,
return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", val);
}
static void rps_dev_flow_table_release_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct rps_dev_flow_table *table = container_of(work,
struct rps_dev_flow_table, free_work);
vfree(table);
}
static void rps_dev_flow_table_release(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
struct rps_dev_flow_table *table = container_of(rcu,
struct rps_dev_flow_table, rcu);
INIT_WORK(&table->free_work, rps_dev_flow_table_release_work);
schedule_work(&table->free_work);
vfree(table);
}
static ssize_t store_rps_dev_flow_table_cnt(struct netdev_rx_queue *queue,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment