Commit 2fb8d367 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/core: Add missing update_rq_clock() call in set_user_nice()

Address this rq-clock update bug:

  WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 195 at ../kernel/sched/sched.h:797 set_next_entity()
  rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP

  Call Trace:
    dump_stack()
    __warn()
    warn_slowpath_fmt()
    set_next_entity()
    ? _raw_spin_lock()
    set_curr_task_fair()
    set_user_nice.part.85()
    set_user_nice()
    create_worker()
    worker_thread()
    kthread()
    ret_from_fork()
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 3bed5e21
...@@ -3752,6 +3752,8 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) ...@@ -3752,6 +3752,8 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
* the task might be in the middle of scheduling on another CPU. * the task might be in the middle of scheduling on another CPU.
*/ */
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf); rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
update_rq_clock(rq);
/* /*
* The RT priorities are set via sched_setscheduler(), but we still * The RT priorities are set via sched_setscheduler(), but we still
* allow the 'normal' nice value to be set - but as expected * allow the 'normal' nice value to be set - but as expected
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment