intel-iommu: Fix AB-BA lockdep report
When unbinding a device so that I could pass it through to a KVM VM, I got the lockdep report below. It looks like a legitimate lock ordering problem: - domain_context_mapping_one() takes iommu->lock and calls iommu_support_dev_iotlb(), which takes device_domain_lock (inside iommu->lock). - domain_remove_one_dev_info() starts by taking device_domain_lock then takes iommu->lock inside it (near the end of the function). So this is the classic AB-BA deadlock. It looks like a safe fix is to simply release device_domain_lock a bit earlier, since as far as I can tell, it doesn't protect any of the stuff accessed at the end of domain_remove_one_dev_info() anyway. BTW, the use of device_domain_lock looks a bit unsafe to me... it's at least not obvious to me why we aren't vulnerable to the race below: iommu_support_dev_iotlb() domain_remove_dev_info() lock device_domain_lock find info unlock device_domain_lock lock device_domain_lock find same info unlock device_domain_lock free_devinfo_mem(info) do stuff with info after it's free However I don't understand the locking here well enough to know if this is a real problem, let alone what the best fix is. Anyway here's the full lockdep output that prompted all of this: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.39.1+ #1 ------------------------------------------------------- bash/13954 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 but task is already holding lock: (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (device_domain_lock){-.-...}: [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130 [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0 [<ffffffff812f8350>] domain_context_mapping_one+0x600/0x750 [<ffffffff812f84df>] domain_context_mapping+0x3f/0x120 [<ffffffff812f9175>] iommu_prepare_identity_map+0x1c5/0x1e0 [<ffffffff81ccf1ca>] intel_iommu_init+0x88e/0xb5e [<ffffffff81cab204>] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x41 [<ffffffff81002165>] do_one_initcall+0x45/0x190 [<ffffffff81ca3d3f>] kernel_init+0xe3/0x168 [<ffffffff8157ac24>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 -> #0 (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}: [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10 [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130 [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0 [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90 [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0 [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0 [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0 [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50 [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0 [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30 [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170 [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190 [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0 [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b other info that might help us debug this: 6 locks held by bash/13954: #0: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811e4464>] sysfs_write_file+0x44/0x170 #1: (s_active#3){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff811e44ed>] sysfs_write_file+0xcd/0x170 #2: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81372edb>] driver_unbind+0x9b/0xc0 #3: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81373cc7>] device_release_driver+0x27/0x50 #4: (&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8108974f>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xb0 #5: (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230 stack backtrace: Pid: 13954, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.39.1+ #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff810993a7>] print_circular_bug+0xf7/0x100 [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10 [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff8109d57d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180 [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130 [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0 [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230 [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90 [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0 [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0 [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0 [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50 [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0 [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30 [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170 [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190 [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0 [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment