Commit 40f0fc2a authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

arch_topology: Use CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of CPUFREQ_NOTIFY

CPUFREQ_NOTIFY is going to get removed soon, lets use
CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of that here. CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY is
called only once (which is exactly what we want here) for each cpufreq
policy when it is first created.
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent afe96907
...@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, ...@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
if (!raw_capacity) if (!raw_capacity)
return 0; return 0;
if (val != CPUFREQ_NOTIFY) if (val != CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY)
return 0; return 0;
pr_debug("cpu_capacity: init cpu capacity for CPUs [%*pbl] (to_visit=%*pbl)\n", pr_debug("cpu_capacity: init cpu capacity for CPUs [%*pbl] (to_visit=%*pbl)\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment