Commit 54297e4d authored by Johannes Berg's avatar Johannes Berg Committed by John W. Linville

mac80211: fix some RX aggregation locking

A few places in mac80211 do not currently acquire
the sta lock for RX aggregation, but they should.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
parent 098a6070
...@@ -720,14 +720,16 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx, ...@@ -720,14 +720,16 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx,
tid = *ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr) & IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK; tid = *ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr) & IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK;
spin_lock(&sta->lock);
if (!sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_active_rx[tid]) if (!sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_active_rx[tid])
goto dont_reorder; goto dont_reorder_unlock;
tid_agg_rx = sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]; tid_agg_rx = sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid];
/* qos null data frames are excluded */ /* qos null data frames are excluded */
if (unlikely(hdr->frame_control & cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_STYPE_NULLFUNC))) if (unlikely(hdr->frame_control & cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_STYPE_NULLFUNC)))
goto dont_reorder; goto dont_reorder_unlock;
/* new, potentially un-ordered, ampdu frame - process it */ /* new, potentially un-ordered, ampdu frame - process it */
...@@ -739,15 +741,20 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx, ...@@ -739,15 +741,20 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx,
/* if this mpdu is fragmented - terminate rx aggregation session */ /* if this mpdu is fragmented - terminate rx aggregation session */
sc = le16_to_cpu(hdr->seq_ctrl); sc = le16_to_cpu(hdr->seq_ctrl);
if (sc & IEEE80211_SCTL_FRAG) { if (sc & IEEE80211_SCTL_FRAG) {
spin_unlock(&sta->lock);
__ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session(sta, tid, WLAN_BACK_RECIPIENT, __ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session(sta, tid, WLAN_BACK_RECIPIENT,
WLAN_REASON_QSTA_REQUIRE_SETUP); WLAN_REASON_QSTA_REQUIRE_SETUP);
dev_kfree_skb(skb); dev_kfree_skb(skb);
return; return;
} }
if (ieee80211_sta_manage_reorder_buf(hw, tid_agg_rx, skb, frames)) if (ieee80211_sta_manage_reorder_buf(hw, tid_agg_rx, skb, frames)) {
spin_unlock(&sta->lock);
return; return;
}
dont_reorder_unlock:
spin_unlock(&sta->lock);
dont_reorder: dont_reorder:
__skb_queue_tail(frames, skb); __skb_queue_tail(frames, skb);
} }
...@@ -1804,9 +1811,12 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_ctrl(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx, struct sk_buff_head *frames) ...@@ -1804,9 +1811,12 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_ctrl(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx, struct sk_buff_head *frames)
if (ieee80211_is_back_req(bar->frame_control)) { if (ieee80211_is_back_req(bar->frame_control)) {
if (!rx->sta) if (!rx->sta)
return RX_DROP_MONITOR; return RX_DROP_MONITOR;
spin_lock(&rx->sta->lock);
tid = le16_to_cpu(bar->control) >> 12; tid = le16_to_cpu(bar->control) >> 12;
if (!rx->sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_active_rx[tid]) if (!rx->sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_active_rx[tid]) {
spin_unlock(&rx->sta->lock);
return RX_DROP_MONITOR; return RX_DROP_MONITOR;
}
tid_agg_rx = rx->sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]; tid_agg_rx = rx->sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid];
start_seq_num = le16_to_cpu(bar->start_seq_num) >> 4; start_seq_num = le16_to_cpu(bar->start_seq_num) >> 4;
...@@ -1820,6 +1830,7 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_ctrl(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx, struct sk_buff_head *frames) ...@@ -1820,6 +1830,7 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_ctrl(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx, struct sk_buff_head *frames)
ieee80211_release_reorder_frames(hw, tid_agg_rx, start_seq_num, ieee80211_release_reorder_frames(hw, tid_agg_rx, start_seq_num,
frames); frames);
kfree_skb(skb); kfree_skb(skb);
spin_unlock(&rx->sta->lock);
return RX_QUEUED; return RX_QUEUED;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment