Commit 76424a0a authored by Chris Rankin's avatar Chris Rankin Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] em28xx: move printk lines outside mutex lock

There's no reason to still be holding the device list mutex for either of these
printk statements.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Rankin <rankincj@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
parent 6c03e38b
......@@ -1210,8 +1210,8 @@ int em28xx_register_extension(struct em28xx_ops *ops)
list_for_each_entry(dev, &em28xx_devlist, devlist) {
ops->init(dev);
}
printk(KERN_INFO "Em28xx: Initialized (%s) extension\n", ops->name);
mutex_unlock(&em28xx_devlist_mutex);
printk(KERN_INFO "Em28xx: Initialized (%s) extension\n", ops->name);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(em28xx_register_extension);
......@@ -1224,9 +1224,9 @@ void em28xx_unregister_extension(struct em28xx_ops *ops)
list_for_each_entry(dev, &em28xx_devlist, devlist) {
ops->fini(dev);
}
printk(KERN_INFO "Em28xx: Removed (%s) extension\n", ops->name);
list_del(&ops->next);
mutex_unlock(&em28xx_devlist_mutex);
printk(KERN_INFO "Em28xx: Removed (%s) extension\n", ops->name);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(em28xx_unregister_extension);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment