Commit 78fb9cdf authored by Lukas Czerner's avatar Lukas Czerner Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: remove unused code from ext4_remove_blocks()

The "head removal" branch in the condition is never used in any code
path in ext4 since the function only caller ext4_ext_rm_leaf() will make
sure that the extent is properly split before removing blocks. Note that
there is a bug in this branch anyway.

This commit removes the unused code completely and makes use of
ext4_error() instead of printk if dubious range is provided.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parent c121ffd0
...@@ -2432,23 +2432,10 @@ static int ext4_remove_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ...@@ -2432,23 +2432,10 @@ static int ext4_remove_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
*partial_cluster = EXT4_B2C(sbi, pblk); *partial_cluster = EXT4_B2C(sbi, pblk);
else else
*partial_cluster = 0; *partial_cluster = 0;
} else if (from == le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) } else
&& to <= le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) + ee_len - 1) { ext4_error(sbi->s_sb, "strange request: removal(2) "
/* head removal */
ext4_lblk_t num;
ext4_fsblk_t start;
num = to - from;
start = ext4_ext_pblock(ex);
ext_debug("free first %u blocks starting %llu\n", num, start);
ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, start, num, flags);
} else {
printk(KERN_INFO "strange request: removal(2) "
"%u-%u from %u:%u\n", "%u-%u from %u:%u\n",
from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len); from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len);
}
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment