bnx2x: off by one in bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set()

The sp_pri_to_cos[] array size depends on the config but lets say it is
BX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0 and max_num_of_cos is also
DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0.  In the original code
"pri == max_num_of_cos" was accepted but it is one past the end of the
array.

Also we used "pri" before capping it.  It's a harmless read past the end
of the array, but it would affect which error message gets printed.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.c

@@ -942,16 +942,16 @@ static int bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set(const struct link_params *params,
 	const u8 max_num_of_cos = (port) ? DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT1 :
 		DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0;
 
-	if (sp_pri_to_cos[pri] != DCBX_INVALID_COS) {
+	if (pri >= max_num_of_cos) {
 		DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid "
-				   "parameter There can't be two COS's with "
-				   "the same strict pri\n");
+		   "parameter Illegal strict priority\n");
 	    return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (pri > max_num_of_cos) {
+	if (sp_pri_to_cos[pri] != DCBX_INVALID_COS) {
 		DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid "
-		   "parameter Illegal strict priority\n");
+				   "parameter There can't be two COS's with "
+				   "the same strict pri\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}