Commit 7f0c020a authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: get rid of 'tpolicy' from __cpufreq_add_dev()

There is no need of this separate variable, use 'policy' instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 22a7cfb0
......@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
{
unsigned int j, cpu = dev->id;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy, *tpolicy;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned long flags;
bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended;
......@@ -1127,10 +1127,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
/* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(tpolicy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tpolicy->related_cpus)) {
list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)) {
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev);
ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment