Commit 830f01b0 authored by Wanpeng Li's avatar Wanpeng Li Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: SVM: Fix disable pause loop exit/pause filtering capability on SVM

'Commit 8566ac8b ("KVM: SVM: Implement pause loop exit logic in SVM")'
drops disable pause loop exit/pause filtering capability completely, I
guess it is a merge fault by Radim since disable vmexits capabilities and
pause loop exit for SVM patchsets are merged at the same time. This patch
reintroduces the disable pause loop exit/pause filtering capability support.
Reported-by: default avatarHaiwei Li <lihaiwei@tencent.com>
Tested-by: default avatarHaiwei Li <lihaiwei@tencent.com>
Fixes: 8566ac8b ("KVM: SVM: Implement pause loop exit logic in SVM")
Signed-off-by: default avatarWanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <1596165141-28874-3-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent d2286ba7
......@@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->nested.vmcb = 0;
svm->vcpu.arch.hflags = 0;
if (pause_filter_count) {
if (!kvm_pause_in_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm)) {
control->pause_filter_count = pause_filter_count;
if (pause_filter_thresh)
control->pause_filter_thresh = pause_filter_thresh;
......@@ -2693,7 +2693,7 @@ static int pause_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
bool in_kernel = (svm_get_cpl(vcpu) == 0);
if (pause_filter_thresh)
if (!kvm_pause_in_guest(vcpu->kvm))
grow_ple_window(vcpu);
kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, in_kernel);
......@@ -3780,7 +3780,7 @@ static void svm_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void svm_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
{
if (pause_filter_thresh)
if (!kvm_pause_in_guest(vcpu->kvm))
shrink_ple_window(vcpu);
}
......@@ -3958,6 +3958,9 @@ static void svm_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
static int svm_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm)
{
if (!pause_filter_count || !pause_filter_thresh)
kvm->arch.pause_in_guest = true;
if (avic) {
int ret = avic_vm_init(kvm);
if (ret)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment