Commit 862372bc authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: GMBUS don't need no forcewake

GMBUS is part of the display engine, and thus has no need for
forcewake. Let's not bother trying to grab it then.

I don't recall if the display engine suffers from system hangs
due to multiple accesses to the same "cacheline" in mmio space.
I hope not since we're no longer protected by the uncore lock
since commit 4e6c2d58 ("drm/i915: Take forcewake once for
the entire GMBUS transaction")

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1476272687-15070-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
parent 06a75ace
......@@ -467,13 +467,9 @@ do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
struct intel_gmbus,
adapter);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = bus->dev_priv;
const unsigned int fw =
intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv, GMBUS0,
FW_REG_READ | FW_REG_WRITE);
int i = 0, inc, try = 0;
int ret = 0;
intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, fw);
retry:
I915_WRITE_FW(GMBUS0, bus->reg0);
......@@ -575,7 +571,6 @@ do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
ret = -EAGAIN;
out:
intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, fw);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment