Commit 95fcc142 authored by Roger Quadros's avatar Roger Quadros Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

gpio: pcf857x: Fix interrupts on multiple instances

commit 2486e673 upstream.

When multiple instances of pcf857x chips are present, a fix up
message [1] is printed during the probe of the 2nd and later
instances.

The issue is that the driver is using the same irq_chip data
structure between multiple instances.

Fix this by allocating the irq_chip data structure per instance.

[1] fix up message addressed by this patch
[    1.212100] gpio gpiochip9: (pcf8575): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.

Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 452ad274
...@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pcf857x_of_table); ...@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pcf857x_of_table);
*/ */
struct pcf857x { struct pcf857x {
struct gpio_chip chip; struct gpio_chip chip;
struct irq_chip irqchip;
struct i2c_client *client; struct i2c_client *client;
struct mutex lock; /* protect 'out' */ struct mutex lock; /* protect 'out' */
unsigned out; /* software latch */ unsigned out; /* software latch */
...@@ -252,18 +253,6 @@ static void pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data) ...@@ -252,18 +253,6 @@ static void pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock); mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock);
} }
static struct irq_chip pcf857x_irq_chip = {
.name = "pcf857x",
.irq_enable = pcf857x_irq_enable,
.irq_disable = pcf857x_irq_disable,
.irq_ack = noop,
.irq_mask = noop,
.irq_unmask = noop,
.irq_set_wake = pcf857x_irq_set_wake,
.irq_bus_lock = pcf857x_irq_bus_lock,
.irq_bus_sync_unlock = pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
};
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
...@@ -376,8 +365,17 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, ...@@ -376,8 +365,17 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
/* Enable irqchip if we have an interrupt */ /* Enable irqchip if we have an interrupt */
if (client->irq) { if (client->irq) {
gpio->irqchip.name = "pcf857x",
gpio->irqchip.irq_enable = pcf857x_irq_enable,
gpio->irqchip.irq_disable = pcf857x_irq_disable,
gpio->irqchip.irq_ack = noop,
gpio->irqchip.irq_mask = noop,
gpio->irqchip.irq_unmask = noop,
gpio->irqchip.irq_set_wake = pcf857x_irq_set_wake,
gpio->irqchip.irq_bus_lock = pcf857x_irq_bus_lock,
gpio->irqchip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
status = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&gpio->chip, status = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&gpio->chip,
&pcf857x_irq_chip, &gpio->irqchip,
0, handle_level_irq, 0, handle_level_irq,
IRQ_TYPE_NONE); IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
if (status) { if (status) {
...@@ -392,7 +390,7 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, ...@@ -392,7 +390,7 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (status) if (status)
goto fail; goto fail;
gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->chip, &pcf857x_irq_chip, gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->chip, &gpio->irqchip,
client->irq); client->irq);
gpio->irq_parent = client->irq; gpio->irq_parent = client->irq;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment