Commit 96a9fdd7 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm: Fix confusing debug message in drm_update_vblank_count()

Now that drm_update_vblank_count() can be called even when we're not
about to enable the vblank interrupts we shouldn't print debug messages
stating otherwise.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent d297e103
...@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc) ...@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
crtc, vblank->last, cur_vblank, diff); crtc, vblank->last, cur_vblank, diff);
} }
DRM_DEBUG("enabling vblank interrupts on crtc %d, missed %d\n", DRM_DEBUG("updating vblank count on crtc %d, missed %d\n",
crtc, diff); crtc, diff);
/* Reinitialize corresponding vblank timestamp if high-precision query /* Reinitialize corresponding vblank timestamp if high-precision query
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment