Commit a498cfe9 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller

Merge branch 'ebpf_helpers'

Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
eBPF updates

Two small eBPF helper additions to better match up with ancillary
classic BPF functionality.
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parents 12028820 c04167ce
......@@ -154,4 +154,7 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_delete_elem_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto;
#endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
......@@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ enum bpf_func_id {
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem, /* void *map_lookup_elem(&map, &key) */
BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem, /* int map_update_elem(&map, &key, &value, flags) */
BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem, /* int map_delete_elem(&map, &key) */
BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32, /* u32 prandom_u32(void) */
BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id, /* u32 raw_smp_processor_id(void) */
__BPF_FUNC_MAX_ID,
};
......
......@@ -661,6 +661,9 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_delete_elem_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto __weak;
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto __weak;
/* To execute LD_ABS/LD_IND instructions __bpf_prog_run() may call
* skb_copy_bits(), so provide a weak definition of it for NET-less config.
*/
......
......@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
*/
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
/* If kernel subsystem is allowing eBPF programs to call this function,
* inside its own verifier_ops->get_func_proto() callback it should return
......@@ -87,3 +89,25 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_delete_elem_proto = {
.arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
.arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY,
};
static u64 bpf_get_prandom_u32(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
{
return prandom_u32();
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto = {
.func = bpf_get_prandom_u32,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
};
static u64 bpf_get_smp_processor_id(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
{
return raw_smp_processor_id();
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto = {
.func = bpf_get_smp_processor_id,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
};
......@@ -1139,6 +1139,10 @@ sk_filter_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
return &bpf_map_update_elem_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem:
return &bpf_map_delete_elem_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32:
return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id:
return &bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto;
default:
return NULL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment