Commit a71ef163 authored by Eric Miao's avatar Eric Miao Committed by Eric Miao

[ARM] pxa: build pwm.c according to HAVE_PWM instead of PXA_PWM

The PXA_PWM config option is really redundant since the introduction
of HAVE_PWM, replace that with HAVE_PWM to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
parent a757ad8b
...@@ -505,12 +505,6 @@ config PXA_SSP ...@@ -505,12 +505,6 @@ config PXA_SSP
help help
Enable support for PXA2xx SSP ports Enable support for PXA2xx SSP ports
config PXA_PWM
tristate
default BACKLIGHT_PWM
help
Enable support for PXA2xx/PXA3xx PWM controllers
config TOSA_BT config TOSA_BT
tristate "Control the state of built-in bluetooth chip on Sharp SL-6000" tristate "Control the state of built-in bluetooth chip on Sharp SL-6000"
depends on MACH_TOSA depends on MACH_TOSA
......
...@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ endif ...@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ endif
# Generic drivers that other drivers may depend upon # Generic drivers that other drivers may depend upon
obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_SSP) += ssp.o obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_SSP) += ssp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_PWM) += pwm.o obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM) += pwm.o
# SoC-specific code # SoC-specific code
obj-$(CONFIG_PXA25x) += mfp-pxa2xx.o pxa2xx.o pxa25x.o obj-$(CONFIG_PXA25x) += mfp-pxa2xx.o pxa2xx.o pxa25x.o
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment