ftrace: Clean up __seq_open_private() return check

The return status check of __seq_open_private() is rather strange:

	iter = __seq_open_private();
	if (iter) {
		/* do stuff */
	}

	return iter ? 0 : -ENOMEM;

It makes much more sense to do the return of failure right away:

	iter = __seq_open_private();
	if (!iter)
		return -ENOMEM;

	/* do stuff */

	return 0;

This clean up will make updates to this code a bit nicer.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
parent 2b87965a
......@@ -3355,12 +3355,13 @@ ftrace_avail_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
return -ENODEV;
iter = __seq_open_private(file, &show_ftrace_seq_ops, sizeof(*iter));
if (iter) {
if (!iter)
return -ENOMEM;
iter->pg = ftrace_pages_start;
iter->ops = &global_ops;
}
return iter ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
static int
......@@ -3369,13 +3370,14 @@ ftrace_enabled_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
struct ftrace_iterator *iter;
iter = __seq_open_private(file, &show_ftrace_seq_ops, sizeof(*iter));
if (iter) {
if (!iter)
return -ENOMEM;
iter->pg = ftrace_pages_start;
iter->flags = FTRACE_ITER_ENABLED;
iter->ops = &global_ops;
}
return iter ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment